Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name
Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name
Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
82<br />
SCOTT W. MATTNER<br />
(Putnam, 1985). Initially, the reason why plants devote resources to the production of<br />
these compounds was not understood as they were regarded as functionless waste<br />
products (Mothes, 1955). It is now increasingly accepted, however, that these<br />
compounds function as defensive agents against pathogens, insects and neighbouring<br />
plants (allelopathy). There is an enormous diversity of allelochemicals produced by<br />
plants (Bansal, 1994), with classification based on chemical structure (Whittaker and<br />
Feeney, 1971; Mandava, 1985; Putnam 1985) or on origin and chemical properties<br />
(Rice, 1984). For example, Rice (1984) recognised 14 main categories of<br />
allelochemicals. Of these groups, however, the phenolics are considered by many as<br />
the most important (Putnam and Duke, 1979; Mandava, 1985; Inderjit, 1996).<br />
Putative allelochemicals have been isolated from a variety of different plant organs,<br />
including shoots, roots, flowers, rhizomes, fruit and seed (Rice, 1984). They are<br />
stored in cell vacuoles so as not to interfere with the donor plant itself (Chou, 1989).<br />
Furthermore, secondary metabolites may be bound to sugars as glycosides or occur as<br />
polymers and crystals rendering them ineffective against the donor (Whittaker and<br />
Feeney, 1971). The release of allelochemicals into the environment may occur through<br />
volatilisation, root exudation, leaching or plant residue decomposition (Rice, 1984).<br />
<strong>Allelochemicals</strong> induce a wide range of symptoms in receiver plants, ranging<br />
from sudden wilting and death (e.g. tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) grown in the<br />
vicinity of black walnut (Juglans nigra), Hale and Orcutt, 1987), to the more common<br />
subtle changes in growth. Determination of this reaction depends on the mode of<br />
action, the concentration, and the susceptibility of the receiver plant to the<br />
allelochemical. Allelopathic effects may be direct, such as affecting plant metabolism<br />
and growth, or indirect, such as altering of soil properties and nutrient status (Inderjit<br />
and Weiner, 2001). Rizvi et al. (1992) explained 12 plant functions that allelochemicals<br />
may affect, including membrane permeability, stomata function and photosynthesis,<br />
and cytology and ultrastructure.<br />
3. THE INFLUENCE OF PATHOGENS ON INTERFERENCE<br />
AND ALLELOPATHY<br />
Natural plant populations increase in production and number of individuals until<br />
constrained by environmental limitations (Burdon, 1987). The constraint of plant<br />
growth by the environment is often mediated through plant interference. Therefore,<br />
the ability of plants to interfere with their neighbours is important in determining<br />
their abundance in a community. Plant pathogens generally reduce the development,<br />
production and longevity of their hosts. In plant communities, this ‘burden of a<br />
parasite’ may result in a partly unoccupied niche that resistant plants re-inhabit.<br />
Overall, pathogens play a significant role in the ecology of plant communities by<br />
maintaining (Peters and Shaw, 1996) or reducing (Burdon, 1991) species diversity,<br />
driving succession (Van der Putten et al., 1993), ensuring plants do not establish<br />
under their parents (Augsberger, 1984) and help determine the long-term composition<br />
of plant communities (Dobson and Crawley, 1994).