13.07.2013 Views

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152<br />

ROBERT J. KREMER<br />

purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) and burning nettle (Urtica urens) in a California<br />

vegetable production field (Fennimore and Jackson, 2003). The natural soil<br />

suppressiveness of the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica in Nigeria appears to be<br />

related to soils under rotations of cereal and leguminous crops that promote antagonist<br />

microbial populations that destroys Striga seeds before germination or kills the<br />

germinated seedlings (Berner et al., 1996; Dashiel et al., 1991). Each of the above<br />

systems strongly suggests that AB growth can be exploited as a sustainable weed<br />

control strategy using relatively simple management practices.<br />

Tactics and approaches for manipulating the field environment to enhance survival,<br />

physiological behavior, and performance of AB might easily be incorporated into<br />

diverse sustainable crop production systems. Such a strategy for natural weed<br />

suppression, also known as conservation biological control (Newman et al., 1998) or<br />

endemic soil-based control (Kulmatiski et al., 2004) relies on establishment of<br />

populations of indigenous or endemic, weed-suppressive microorganisms in soil. As<br />

demonstrated previously, many of these indigenous microorganisms are AB (Kremer<br />

and Li, 2003; Li and Kremer, 2000). Management practices including tillage, crop<br />

rotation, residue manipulation, and organic amendments enhance or induce favorable<br />

factors in the habitat for sustaining effective populations of natural AB. Crop<br />

management practices that involve reduced tillage, maintain high soil organic matter,<br />

and limit inputs of agrichemicals increased levels of deleterious rhizobacteria associated<br />

with weed seedlings and contribute to natural weed suppression (Li and Kremer,<br />

2000). Deliberate use of management practices that benefit natural weed-antagonistic<br />

AB can adversely affect weed population dynamics in production fields through seed<br />

and seedling mortality and growth suppression.<br />

6. SUMMARY<br />

The future use of AB to manage weeds in both conventional and sustainable agriculture<br />

seems promising. Because AB generally do not attack specific biochemical sites within<br />

the plant, unlike conventional herbicides, they offer a means to control weeds without<br />

causing direct selective pressure on the weed population, therefore, development of<br />

resistance is not a major consideration. Additionally, the use of AB appears to be<br />

environmentally benign relative to herbicides. These characteristics make AB an<br />

attractive approach for managing crop weeds in a sustainable manner, even within<br />

the boundaries of conventional agriculture systems. The recent demonstrations of<br />

apparent weed-suppressive soils may lead to development of specific management<br />

strategies for the establishment and persistence of native AB directly in soils conducive<br />

to annual weed infestations.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

Aldrich, R.J., Kremer, R.J. Principles in Weed Management. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, 1997<br />

Baker, K.F., Cook, R.J. <strong>Biologica</strong>l Control of Plant Pathogens. Freeman: San Francisco, 1974.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!