Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name
Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name
Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
152<br />
ROBERT J. KREMER<br />
purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) and burning nettle (Urtica urens) in a California<br />
vegetable production field (Fennimore and Jackson, 2003). The natural soil<br />
suppressiveness of the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica in Nigeria appears to be<br />
related to soils under rotations of cereal and leguminous crops that promote antagonist<br />
microbial populations that destroys Striga seeds before germination or kills the<br />
germinated seedlings (Berner et al., 1996; Dashiel et al., 1991). Each of the above<br />
systems strongly suggests that AB growth can be exploited as a sustainable weed<br />
control strategy using relatively simple management practices.<br />
Tactics and approaches for manipulating the field environment to enhance survival,<br />
physiological behavior, and performance of AB might easily be incorporated into<br />
diverse sustainable crop production systems. Such a strategy for natural weed<br />
suppression, also known as conservation biological control (Newman et al., 1998) or<br />
endemic soil-based control (Kulmatiski et al., 2004) relies on establishment of<br />
populations of indigenous or endemic, weed-suppressive microorganisms in soil. As<br />
demonstrated previously, many of these indigenous microorganisms are AB (Kremer<br />
and Li, 2003; Li and Kremer, 2000). Management practices including tillage, crop<br />
rotation, residue manipulation, and organic amendments enhance or induce favorable<br />
factors in the habitat for sustaining effective populations of natural AB. Crop<br />
management practices that involve reduced tillage, maintain high soil organic matter,<br />
and limit inputs of agrichemicals increased levels of deleterious rhizobacteria associated<br />
with weed seedlings and contribute to natural weed suppression (Li and Kremer,<br />
2000). Deliberate use of management practices that benefit natural weed-antagonistic<br />
AB can adversely affect weed population dynamics in production fields through seed<br />
and seedling mortality and growth suppression.<br />
6. SUMMARY<br />
The future use of AB to manage weeds in both conventional and sustainable agriculture<br />
seems promising. Because AB generally do not attack specific biochemical sites within<br />
the plant, unlike conventional herbicides, they offer a means to control weeds without<br />
causing direct selective pressure on the weed population, therefore, development of<br />
resistance is not a major consideration. Additionally, the use of AB appears to be<br />
environmentally benign relative to herbicides. These characteristics make AB an<br />
attractive approach for managing crop weeds in a sustainable manner, even within<br />
the boundaries of conventional agriculture systems. The recent demonstrations of<br />
apparent weed-suppressive soils may lead to development of specific management<br />
strategies for the establishment and persistence of native AB directly in soils conducive<br />
to annual weed infestations.<br />
7. REFERENCES<br />
Aldrich, R.J., Kremer, R.J. Principles in Weed Management. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, 1997<br />
Baker, K.F., Cook, R.J. <strong>Biologica</strong>l Control of Plant Pathogens. Freeman: San Francisco, 1974.