13.07.2013 Views

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BACTERIAL ROOT ZONE COMMUNITIES, BENEFICIAL ALLELOPATHIES AND PLANT DISEASE CONTROL<br />

in the face of community antagonism to pathogen invasion, and should, perhaps, be<br />

viewed independently of any plant health benefits.<br />

While pathogen antagonism has been collectively termed biological control and<br />

defined by Baker (1987) as ‘... a decrease of inoculum or the disease-producing activity<br />

of a pathogen accomplished through one or more organisms, including the host plant...’,<br />

it can also be argued that antagonism, at the communal level, is not necessarily directed<br />

at phytopathogens specifically, but at any group of organisms ‘invading’ the trophic<br />

level of an established community. In this sense, interactions amongst autochthonous<br />

(established) consortia (functional groupings) of microflora can be classified as<br />

beneficial where they promote plant health or inhibit phytopathogen attack (Mukerji<br />

et al., 1999).<br />

Accordingly, any exochthonous latecomer (colonist or pathogen) is likely to<br />

provoke a negative response from an established community, since its arrival will<br />

upset any balance amongst the community members (Atlas, 1986). In this respect,<br />

the resilience of a soil microbial community, when expressed in terms of its ability to<br />

inhibit invasions (colonization) by ‘non-community’ species will, in part, define its<br />

stability.<br />

As such, exochthonous species, enter the niche environment by chance but cannot<br />

maintain themselves in an active condition (Cooke and Rayner 1984). By contrast,<br />

indigenous communities may be subdivided into the slow growing autochthonous<br />

groups and the fast growing transient zymogenous groups - the former surviving on<br />

refractory substrates, and so, for the most part, remaining constantly active, while the<br />

latter only become active when a suitable food resource presents itself, and so are<br />

otherwise quiescent (Cooke and Rayner 1984).<br />

2.2. ‘Self-awareness’ in Bacterial Communities<br />

It is believed that population density of a consortium component species mediates<br />

population function through ‘self-awareness’ mechanisms such as ‘quorum sensing’,<br />

that enable bacteria to communicate among and between species in a consortium<br />

(Miller and Bassler, 2001).<br />

The degree to which bacterial consortia behave as commensal, protocooperative<br />

or pathogenic assemblages is dictated (in part) by the component populations’ density,<br />

which will vary according to the prevailing abiotic conditions affecting secondary<br />

metabolite production - including those with antibiotic properties (Grimwood et al.,<br />

1989; Tateda et al., 2001). Key abiotic factors include, among others, pH, temperature,<br />

moisture, salinity, oxygen concentration and carbon availability (Duffy and Défago,<br />

1999; Gaballa et al., 1997; Gutterson et al., 1988; Nakata et al., 1999; Shanahan et<br />

al., 1992; Slininger and Jackson, 1992; Slininger and Sheawilbur, 1995)<br />

A population’s ability to identify ‘itself’ through the recognition of diffusible<br />

signaling molecules (autoinducers) - generally acylated homoserine lactones (acyl-<br />

HSLs) for gram-negative bacteria, and oligopeptides for gram-positive bacteria - elicits<br />

the modulation of gene expression, that can alter bacterial function in ways that may<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!