13.07.2013 Views

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

Allelochemicals Biologica... - Name

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPACT OF PATHOGENS ON PLANT INTERFERENCE AND<br />

ALLELOPATHY<br />

further trials, high rust severity and high soil moisture contents increased the<br />

suppression of clover by rusted ryegrass.<br />

The ability of rust to directly inhibit or infect clover could not explain the results<br />

from these studies, since clover is a non-host of P. coronata and inoculation with this<br />

rust did not reduce the yield of clover monocultures. Under some conditions, infection<br />

by rusts can increase the scavenging ability of some hosts for water and nutrient<br />

resources (Ahmad et al., 1982; Paul and Ayres, 1988), potentially increasing their<br />

competitive ability. For this to explain the results from Mattner’s studies, however,<br />

the suppression of clover by rusted ryegrass should have been greatest at high plant<br />

densities where competition for resources was most intense. Instead, the suppression<br />

of clover by rusted ryegrass was greatest at low densities where resources were plentiful<br />

and competition was low. Furthermore, the ability of rusted ryegrass to suppress<br />

clover continued even beyond the death of the plant, when it had no capacity to scavenge<br />

resources. For these reasons, Mattner (1998) posed the hypothesis that rust reduces<br />

the competitiveness of ryegrass, while simultaneously increasing its allelopathic ability.<br />

In this way, it was expected that the expression of allelopathy by rusted ryegrass was<br />

greatest at low densities, where there was little competition and the effects of rust in<br />

reducing ryegrass competitiveness did not obscure its effects on increasing allelopathy.<br />

Furthermore, high plant densities may detoxify or dilute the action of allelochemicals<br />

(Thijs et al., 1994).<br />

To test the validity of this hypothesis and to separate the effects of competition<br />

and allelopathy, four bioassays for allelopathy were conducted (Mattner, 1998; Mattner<br />

and Parbery, 2001). Each bioassay highlighted the potential for extracts, leachate, or<br />

residues from ryegrass to inhibit the yield of clover through allelopathy, and for rust<br />

to enhance this potential. For example, soil previously growing rusted ryegrass<br />

suppressed clover biomass by 36% compared with soil previously growing healthy<br />

ryegrass. Similarly, leachate from soil supporting rusted ryegrass suppressed clover<br />

biomass by 27% compared with that from healthy ryegrass (Mattner and Parbery,<br />

2001). Although some bioassays have confounding and interpretational problems<br />

(Stowe, 1979; Inderjit and Weston, 2000), the conformity of results between these<br />

different bioassays provides strong evidence for the hypothesis that rust infection<br />

increases the allelopathic ability of ryegrass. Furthermore, in the field, the proportion<br />

of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) reduced in areas of a depleted pasture dominated<br />

by rusted ryegrass, compared with areas dominated by non-rusted ryegrass (Mattner,<br />

1998). Further bioassays provided evidence that this association potentially related<br />

to an enhanced allelopathic ability of ryegrass rather than to differences in soil<br />

chemistry. Thus, this study highlighted the potential for rust to increase ryegrass<br />

allelopathy in the field.<br />

Mattner (1998) suggested two mechanisms by which rust may increase ryegrass<br />

allelopathy. Firstly, rust may directly stimulate the production of allelochemicals by<br />

ryegrass in a defensive response to infection. Alternatively, or additionally, the increased<br />

rate of tissue senescence in ryegrass induced by rust may result in a higher concentration<br />

of plant residues reaching the soil. These residues may then form an allelochemical<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!