13.07.2013 Views

conference proceedings - Australian Army

conference proceedings - Australian Army

conference proceedings - Australian Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160<br />

THE AUSTRALIAN ARMY AND THE VIETNAM WAR 1962–1972<br />

were given the task of convincing their host governments for assistance to Vietnam: ‘I<br />

am gravely disappointed by the inadequacy of the actions by our [American] friends and<br />

allies in response to our request that they share the burden of Free World responsibility<br />

in Viet Nam.’ He averred that Americans ‘should not be required to continue indefinitely,<br />

alone and unassisted, to be the only champions of freedom in Viet Nam today’. 39 Johnson<br />

now had no choice but to turn to the country his aides derided as America’s unstable<br />

stepchild.<br />

A turning point in the US-Korean Alliance in the Vietnam War came in the form of<br />

major floods that hit the north and central coastal regions of South Vietnam at the end<br />

of 1964. As the extent of the damages became apparent, Rusk inquired of ambassador<br />

Maxwell Taylor in Saigon whether Washington should use the floods as a pretext for<br />

dispatching American military engineers, accompanied by ‘appropriate combat forces<br />

for security purposes’. 40 Taylor was opposed to the dispatch of American forces that<br />

would give the Saigon government the wrong impression that ‘the US is prepared to<br />

take over more of the responsibilities’ of the war. Therefore, the ambassador proposed,<br />

the damages from the flood should be used as ‘a means of trying to obtain third country<br />

military engineer aid’. 41 Rusk agreed and on 17 December, the US ambassador to<br />

Seoul, Winthrop Brown, was instructed to solicit ‘military engineers or additional<br />

military medical units’ because there was ‘much road repair and bridge-building to be<br />

done in flood-damaged areas of Central Viet Nam’. 42 To the shock of the envoys Park<br />

volunteered ‘two combat divisions … at any time they might be needed’. 43 For the<br />

time being, however, Park had to be satisfied with sending non-combat soldiers. In late<br />

February 1965, the first contingent of 600 military engineers arrived in South Vietnam.<br />

Two months later this force grew to 2400 soldiers, consisting of ‘a high quality, handpicked<br />

group’ that made ‘an excellent impression’. 44 South Korea had now become the<br />

second largest foreign presence in South Vietnam after the US.<br />

39. Circular Telegram 14, 2 July 1964, ‘Cables, Vol. XIII, 6/64-7/64’, Box 6, Vietnam Country File,<br />

LBJL.<br />

40. Cable 1065 to Saigon, 12 November 1964, ‘Cables, Vol. XXI, 11/1-15/94’, Box 10, Vietnam Country<br />

File, LBJL.<br />

41. Cable 1502 from Saigon, 14 November 1964, ‘Cables, Vol. XXI, 11/1-15/94’, Box 10, Vietnam Country<br />

File, LBJL.<br />

42. Cable 531 to Seoul, 17 December 1964, ‘Cables, Vol. II, 7/64-8/65’, Box 254, Korea Country File,<br />

LBJL.<br />

43. Cable 552 from Seoul, 19 December 1964, ‘Cables, Vol. II, 7/64-8/65’, Box 254, Korea Country File,<br />

LBJL; Chester L. Cooper (member of National Security Council) and Bundy to Johnson, 22 December<br />

1964, ‘memos, Vol. XXIV, 12/19- 25/64’, Box 11, Vietnam Country File, LBJL.<br />

44. Situation report on South Vietnam, 3 march 1965, ‘memos, Vol. XIX, 3/1 - 8/65’, Box 14, Vietnam<br />

Country File, LBJL.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!