conference proceedings - Australian Army
conference proceedings - Australian Army
conference proceedings - Australian Army
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
220<br />
57. McKay, Delta Four, 118.<br />
58. Ibid., 222.<br />
59. Taylor, Last Out, 232.<br />
THE AUSTRALIAN ARMY AND THE VIETNAM WAR 1962–1972<br />
Fortunately <strong>Australian</strong> and New Zealand infantrymen share certain characteristics, such<br />
as initiative, self confidence, endurance, tenacity, courage, aggressiveness, and reliability.<br />
Perhaps it is something to do with the fact that both are from relatively young nations<br />
where the respective environments can be harsh and unforgiving and people depended<br />
on one another to survive in the early days. Both armies are relatively small; there is<br />
no one else to blame—you cannot hide, and mateship breeds its own loyalty.<br />
Much has been written over centuries about loyalty to sovereign, country and<br />
regiment, but Jerry Taylor, who served in both 2 and 4RAR/NZ (ANZAC) Battalions,<br />
best sums it up when referring to fear, something that all infantrymen experience in<br />
battle (some are just reluctant to admit it): ‘It’s loyalty to the group, comradeship, what<br />
we in Australia call ‘mateship’, that really causes men to overcome fear. So the stronger<br />
that loyalty is, in my view, the better men fight. In the end, it’s mainly a function of<br />
morale.’ 57<br />
In the ANZAC Battalions this mateship extended between Diggers and Kiwis. Each<br />
was aware that we were from separate nations but the ‘Antipodeans’ shared an inherited<br />
loyalty over many decades that encompassed one another and neither an <strong>Australian</strong> nor<br />
Kiwi individual, section, platoon or company would be prepared to let the other down<br />
in battle. They were united on this aspect of dependability—after all, it was their own<br />
unit.<br />
This did not mean that there was not a strong competitiveness between the two in<br />
or out of the bush, particularly when it came to singing and drinking, as an <strong>Australian</strong><br />
section commander recalls:<br />
Kiwis—they could play harder in town than we could, but having said that, when<br />
we got into trouble with the 3rd of the 33rd (3 Battalion, 33 NVA Regiment on<br />
21 September 1971) they were the company reacted to come and assist us ...<br />
When they arrived, they really looked the part. They looked like they meant<br />
business, and the thing I liked about them was even though they were made up<br />
of Maoris and Pakehas—they were us. New Zealand/<strong>Australian</strong>s, <strong>Australian</strong>s/<br />
New Zealanders. They were trained under the same system as we were and I<br />
had nothing but confidence in their ability. 58<br />
This respect was mutual, for when the bodies of the Diggers killed during the battle<br />
were carried past the Kiwis securing the track from the bunker system to the extraction<br />
point they faced inwards and shouldered arms. It was, in the words of Jerry Taylor, ‘an<br />
eloquent and moving gesture: the tribute of warriors to fallen comrades’. 59