sr 60 “twin pairs” - City of Vero Beach

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
9: SR 60 WB & 11 Avenue
11/13/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph) 0 0 0 15 748 46 19 97 0 0 34 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Total Lost time (s) 3.9 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.2
Lane Util. Factor 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 6124 1770 1863 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 6124 925 1863 1863 1583
Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.87 0.71 0.75 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 21 860 65 25 133 0 0 37 38
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 933 0 25 133 0 0 37 5
Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 6 3 8 4
Permitted Phases 6 8 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.6 13.8 13.8 7.4 7.4
Effective Green, g (s) 37.1 14.8 14.8 8.4 8.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.14
Clearance Time (s) 5.4 5.0 5.2 5.2 5.2
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3786 261 459 260 221
v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.07 0.02
v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.02 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.25 0.10 0.29 0.14 0.02
Uniform Delay, d1 5.2 17.4 18.3 22.6 22.3
Progression Factor 0.89 1.03 1.01 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.0
Delay (s) 4.8 18.1 18.9 22.9 22.3
Level of Service A B B C C
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 4.8 18.8 22.6
Approach LOS A A B C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.28
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
PM Peak 5:00 pm 11/9/2012 2012 Existing Conditions Synchro 8 Report
Page 9