18.07.2013 Views

Scripture and God in Christianity

Scripture and God in Christianity

Scripture and God in Christianity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Christ. He taught that Jesus was merely a man from beneath <strong>and</strong> not one <strong>in</strong> substance with <strong>God</strong>.<br />

The "Redeemer was by the constitution of his nature a man, who arose <strong>in</strong> time by birth; he was<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>gly "from beneath", but the Logos of <strong>God</strong> <strong>in</strong>spired him from above. The union of the<br />

Logos with the man Jesus is to be represented as an <strong>in</strong>dwell<strong>in</strong>g by means of an <strong>in</strong>spiration act<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from without, so the Logos becomes that <strong>in</strong> Jesus which <strong>in</strong> the Christian is called by the Apostle<br />

" the <strong>in</strong>ner man"; ...the Logos dwelt <strong>in</strong> Jesus not " <strong>in</strong> substance but <strong>in</strong> quality".... Therefore the<br />

Logos is to be steadily dist<strong>in</strong>guished from Jesus; he is greater than the latter. Mary did not bear<br />

the Logos, but a man like us <strong>in</strong> his nature, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> his baptism it was not the Logos, but the man,<br />

was ano<strong>in</strong>ted with the Spirit. However, Jesus was, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, vouchsafed the div<strong>in</strong>e<br />

grace <strong>in</strong> a special degree, <strong>and</strong> his position was unique. Moreover, the proof he gave of his moral<br />

perfection corresponded to his peculiar equipment. The only unity between two persons, accord<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

between <strong>God</strong> <strong>and</strong> Jesus, is that of the disposition <strong>and</strong> the will." 541<br />

As Jesus advanced <strong>in</strong> the manifestation of goodness <strong>and</strong> submission to the will of <strong>God</strong>, he became<br />

the "Redeemer <strong>and</strong> Savior of the human race, <strong>and</strong> at the same time entered <strong>in</strong>to an eternally<br />

<strong>in</strong>dissoluble union with <strong>God</strong>, because his love can never cease. Now he has obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>God</strong>,<br />

as the reward of his love, the name which is above every name; <strong>God</strong> has committed to him the<br />

Judgment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vested him with div<strong>in</strong>e dignity, so that now we can call him "<strong>God</strong>" [born] of<br />

the virg<strong>in</strong>". So also we are entitled to speak of a pre-existence of Christ <strong>in</strong> the prior decree <strong>and</strong><br />

prophecy of <strong>God</strong>, <strong>and</strong> to say that he became <strong>God</strong> through div<strong>in</strong>e grace <strong>and</strong> his constant manifestation<br />

of goodness." 542 It is clear that Paul did not believe <strong>in</strong> the div<strong>in</strong>e nature of Jesus. On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> addition to his adoptionism, he sought to prove that the assumption that Jesus has<br />

the div<strong>in</strong>e nature or was by nature Son of <strong>God</strong> "led to hav<strong>in</strong>g two gods, to the destruction of<br />

Monotheism." 543 He became <strong>God</strong> but somehow, as says, Paul Tillich,"he had to deserve to become<br />

<strong>God</strong>." 544 He banished from div<strong>in</strong>e service all Church psalms that expressed <strong>in</strong> any sense the<br />

essential div<strong>in</strong>ity of Christ.<br />

Paul was condemned at a Synod of Antioch held <strong>in</strong> 268, two earlier synods hav<strong>in</strong>g failed to take<br />

action <strong>in</strong> the matter. He was declared as heretical because he denied Jesus' pre-existence <strong>and</strong> his<br />

unity of substance with <strong>God</strong> or <strong>in</strong> other words his proper div<strong>in</strong>ity.<br />

Though both types of Monarchianisms were condemned as heretical they, <strong>in</strong> different ways, challenged<br />

<strong>and</strong> pushed the orthodoxy to look <strong>in</strong>to the immense difficulties <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> their underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the transcendence <strong>and</strong> unity of <strong>God</strong> <strong>and</strong> clarify it <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligible terms. The orthodox<br />

Fathers <strong>in</strong>sisted upon their concept of relative unity of <strong>God</strong> by hold<strong>in</strong>g to their Logos Christology.<br />

By the end of the third century the Logos Christology became generally accepted <strong>in</strong> all parts<br />

of the church <strong>and</strong> found its place <strong>in</strong> most of the creeds framed <strong>in</strong> that period, especially <strong>in</strong> the<br />

East. 545<br />

Arianism:<br />

Though the official Logos Christology, or belief <strong>in</strong> the div<strong>in</strong>e nature of Jesus, disposed of the div<strong>in</strong>e-human<br />

doctr<strong>in</strong>e of Dynamic Monarchianism, their doctr<strong>in</strong>e did not pass without leav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

trace. Lucian <strong>and</strong> Arius were <strong>in</strong>spired, as observes Harnack, "by the genius of Paul." 546 Arius, to<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!