18.07.2013 Views

Scripture and God in Christianity

Scripture and God in Christianity

Scripture and God in Christianity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some particular man to whom the name especially belongs. For Peter is no more man than Andrew<br />

or John or James. Hence, as the word embraces all that are <strong>in</strong>cluded under the same name,<br />

there is need of some mark of dist<strong>in</strong>ction by which we may recognize not man <strong>in</strong> general but Peter<br />

or John. There are other nouns which st<strong>and</strong> for a particular object <strong>and</strong> denote not the one nature<br />

but a separate th<strong>in</strong>g hav<strong>in</strong>g noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> common, so far as its <strong>in</strong>dividuality goes, with others<br />

of the same k<strong>in</strong>d, like Paul or Timothy....Thus when two or more are taken together, such as Paul<br />

<strong>and</strong> Silvanus <strong>and</strong> Timothy, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>quiry is made concern<strong>in</strong>g their substance, we do not use one<br />

word for the substance of Paul, another for that of Silvanus, <strong>and</strong> other for that of Timothy....If<br />

then you transfer to theology the dist<strong>in</strong>ction you have drawn <strong>in</strong> human affairs between substance<br />

<strong>and</strong> hypostasis you will not go wrong." 630<br />

Gregory of Nazianzuz expla<strong>in</strong>ed the formula by the follow<strong>in</strong>g example: "What was Adam? A<br />

creature of <strong>God</strong>. What, then, was Eve? A fragment of the creature. And what was Seth? The begotten<br />

of both. Does it, then, seem to you that creature <strong>and</strong> fragment <strong>and</strong> begotten are the same<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g? Of course it does not. But were not these persons consubstantial? Of course they were.<br />

Well, then, here it is an acknowledged fact that different persons may have the same substance."<br />

631 He further argues that "For the Father is not Son, <strong>and</strong> yet this is not due to either deficiency<br />

or subjection of essence; but the very fact of be<strong>in</strong>g unbegotten or begotten, or proceed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

has given the name of Father to the first, of the Son to the second, <strong>and</strong> to the third, him of whom<br />

we are speak<strong>in</strong>g, of the Holy Ghost, that the dist<strong>in</strong>ction of three persons may be preserved <strong>in</strong> the<br />

one nature <strong>and</strong> dignity of the <strong>God</strong>head. For neither is the Son Father, for the Father is one, but he<br />

is what the Father is; nor is the Spirit Son because he is of <strong>God</strong>, for the only-begotten is one, but<br />

he is what the Son is. The three are one <strong>in</strong> <strong>God</strong>head, <strong>and</strong> the one three <strong>in</strong> properties; so that neither<br />

is the unity a Sabellian one, nor does the Tr<strong>in</strong>ity countenance the present evil dist<strong>in</strong>ction." 632<br />

In connection with the complete equality of the three persons Gregory of Nazianzuz writes: "To<br />

us there is one <strong>God</strong>, for the <strong>God</strong>head is one, <strong>and</strong> all that proceeds from his is referred to one,<br />

though we believe <strong>in</strong> three Persons. For one is not more <strong>and</strong> another less <strong>God</strong>; nor is one before<br />

<strong>and</strong> another after; nor are they divided <strong>in</strong> will or parted <strong>in</strong> power; nor can you f<strong>in</strong>d here any of the<br />

qualities of divisible th<strong>in</strong>gs; but the <strong>God</strong>head is, to speak concisely, undivided <strong>in</strong> separate Persons;<br />

<strong>and</strong> there is one m<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>g of lights, as it were of three suns jo<strong>in</strong>ed to each other. When,<br />

then, we look at the <strong>God</strong>head, or the first cause, or the monarchia, that which we conceive is one;<br />

but when we look at the Persons <strong>in</strong> whom the <strong>God</strong>head dwells, <strong>and</strong> at those who timelessly <strong>and</strong><br />

with equal glory have their be<strong>in</strong>g from the first cause, there are three whom we worship." 633<br />

Gregory of Nyssa gives the example of gold observ<strong>in</strong>g that "there may be many golden staters,<br />

but gold is one, so we may be confronted with many who <strong>in</strong>dividually share <strong>in</strong> human nature,<br />

such as Peter, James, <strong>and</strong> John, yet the "man" [the human nature] <strong>in</strong> them is one." 634 There is a<br />

complete operational harmony between these three dist<strong>in</strong>ct Persons, "We do not learn that the Father<br />

does someth<strong>in</strong>g on his own, <strong>in</strong> which the Son does not co-operate. Or aga<strong>in</strong>, that the Son<br />

acts on his own without the Spirit. Rather does every operation which extends from <strong>God</strong> to creation<br />

<strong>and</strong> is designated accord<strong>in</strong>g to our differ<strong>in</strong>g conceptions of it have its orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Father,<br />

proceed through the Son, <strong>and</strong> reach its completion by the Holy Spirit. It is for this reason that the<br />

word for the operation is not divided among the persons <strong>in</strong>volved. For the action of each <strong>in</strong> any<br />

matter is not separate <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualized. But whatever occurs, whether <strong>in</strong> reference to <strong>God</strong>'s<br />

providence for us or to the government <strong>and</strong> constitution of the universe, occurs through the three<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!