19.07.2013 Views

St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan Department ...

St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan Department ...

St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Psychology Research Ethics Committee (Psy-REC) would like to remind you that all 300 B level<br />

lab projects involving data collection require ethical approval by Psy-REC. The committee has the authorization to<br />

approve minimal risk protocols, including those that involve vulnerable populations, such as children or adolescents.<br />

When we encounter a protocol that, in our opinion, exceeds minimal risk, then we will conduct an initial review and<br />

forward the application to the Behavioural REB requesting an expedited review on your behalf.<br />

Please be aware that ethical approval is necessary before you begin data collection<br />

The review procedures (for both mandatory pre-review and committee review) are outlined on the Psy-REC website<br />

http://artsandscience.usask.ca/psychology/department/ethics.php. Please be aware that the review procedures<br />

outlined on the website will be strictly adhered to during the coming semester. It is your responsibility to follow<br />

these procedures in order to facilitate a timely review <strong>of</strong> your protocol.<br />

Psy-REC Application Guidelines<br />

Below are detailed guidelines for completing the Psy-REC applications for ethical approval <strong>of</strong> undergraduate<br />

research. Please read these guidelines carefully and refer to them <strong>of</strong>ten while completing your application. Failure<br />

to comply with these guidelines most <strong>of</strong>ten results in applications requiring modifications and resubmission<br />

before ethical approval is granted.<br />

These guidelines and suggested “standard statements” have been developed after extensive review <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

common revisions required in past years. They can be used for most class projects and honours theses. Feel free to<br />

use the standard statements verbatim if they apply to your proposed research – you have our permission and this will<br />

not constitute plagiarism! However, be aware that they may require adaptations to be applicable to your specific<br />

research project. You remain responsible for ensuring that the information contained in your application is<br />

complete and accurate for your study. You are also responsible for ensuring that the information provided in<br />

your application is consistent with the information provided in other sections <strong>of</strong> the application as well as in the<br />

recruitment, consent and debriefing materials.<br />

TEMPLATES: It is necessary that you submit your application using the most recent version <strong>of</strong> the Psy-REC<br />

application form and consent form templates. Applications that are submitted in an alternative format will be<br />

returned without review.<br />

SIGNATURES: Applications that are submitted to Psy-REC without the necessary signatures (student-researchers<br />

and faculty supervisor) will be returned without review. The faculty supervisor signature denotes that the supervisor<br />

has carefully read the application and approves <strong>of</strong> all elements <strong>of</strong> the research as proposed.<br />

SMALL SAMPLE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: In some studies, the anonymity/confidentiality <strong>of</strong> the participants<br />

cannot be guaranteed because <strong>of</strong> either a small number <strong>of</strong> participants involved or their membership in an<br />

identifiable population. Alternatively, the research report may require the use <strong>of</strong> a direct quotes or other information<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!