20.07.2013 Views

Notes on computational linguistics.pdf - UCLA Department of ...

Notes on computational linguistics.pdf - UCLA Department of ...

Notes on computational linguistics.pdf - UCLA Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stabler - Lx 185/209 2003<br />

To deal with this problem, Charniak, Goldwater, and Johns<strong>on</strong> (1998) explore the prospects for using a<br />

probabilistic chart parsing method that builds <strong>on</strong>ly the n best analyses (<strong>of</strong> each category for each span<br />

<strong>of</strong> the input) for some n.<br />

(4) Is it reas<strong>on</strong>able to think that a probabilistic language models can handle these disambiguati<strong>on</strong> problems?<br />

It is not clear that this questi<strong>on</strong> has any sense, since the term ‘probabilistic language model’ apparently<br />

covers almost everything, including, as a limiting case, the simple, discrete models that we have been<br />

studying previously.<br />

However, it is important to recognize that the disambiguati<strong>on</strong> problem is a hard <strong>on</strong>e, and clearly involves<br />

background factors that cannot be regarded as linguistic.<br />

It has been generally recognized since the early studies <strong>of</strong> language in the traditi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> analytic philosophy,<br />

and since the earliest developments in modern formal semantics, that the problem <strong>of</strong> determining<br />

the intended reading <strong>of</strong> a sentence, like the problem <strong>of</strong> determining the intended reference <strong>of</strong> a name<br />

or noun phrase is, at least, well bey<strong>on</strong>d the analytical tools available now. See, e.g., Partee (1975, p80),<br />

Kamp (1984, p39), Fodor (1983), Putnam (1986, p222), and many others. Putnam argues, for example,<br />

that<br />

…deciding – at least in hard cases – whether two terms have the same meaning or whether they<br />

have the same reference or whether they could have the same reference may involve deciding<br />

what is and what is not a good scientific explanati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

From this perspective, the extent to which simple statistical models account for human language use<br />

is surprising! As we will see, while we say surprising and new things quite a lot, it is easy to discern<br />

creatures <strong>of</strong> habit behind language use as well.<br />

We briefly survey some <strong>of</strong> the most basic c<strong>on</strong>cepts <strong>of</strong> probability theory and informati<strong>on</strong>. Reading quickly<br />

over at least §8.1.1-§8.1.3 is recommended, but the main thread <strong>of</strong> development can be followed by skipping<br />

directly to §8.2.1 <strong>on</strong> page 159.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!