20.07.2013 Views

Notes on computational linguistics.pdf - UCLA Department of ...

Notes on computational linguistics.pdf - UCLA Department of ...

Notes on computational linguistics.pdf - UCLA Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stabler - Lx 185/209 2003<br />

10.3.6 C<strong>on</strong>trol verbs<br />

There is another pattern <strong>of</strong> semantic relati<strong>on</strong>s that is actually more comm<strong>on</strong> that the raising verb pattern:<br />

namely, when a main clause has a verb selecting the main subject, and the embedded clause has no pr<strong>on</strong>ounced<br />

subject, with the embedded subject understood to be the same as the main clause subject:<br />

Titus wants to eat<br />

Titus tries to eat<br />

One proposal for these c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>s is that the embedded subjects in these sentences is an empty (i.e. unpr<strong>on</strong>ounced)<br />

pr<strong>on</strong>oun which must be “c<strong>on</strong>trolled” by the subject in the sense <strong>of</strong> being coreferential. 47<br />

The idea is that we have a semantic pattern here like this:<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

agent<br />

theme<br />

agent<br />

Titus try −s to PRO praise Lavinia<br />

theme<br />

coreferential, "c<strong>on</strong>trolled" pr<strong>on</strong>ominal element<br />

We almost succeed in getting a simple versi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this proposal with just the following lexical items:<br />

try::=T V want::=T V want::=T +k V<br />

ɛ::D<br />

Notice that the features <strong>of</strong> try are rather like a c<strong>on</strong>trol verb’s features, except that it does not assign case to<br />

the embedded object. Since the embedded object cannot get case from the infinitival either, we need to use<br />

the empty determiner provided here because this lexical item does not need case.<br />

The problem with this simple proposal is that the empty D is allowed to appear in either <strong>of</strong> two positi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

The first <strong>of</strong> the following trees is the <strong>on</strong>e we want, but the lexical items allow the sec<strong>on</strong>d <strong>on</strong>e too:<br />

T<br />

t<br />

C<br />

C<br />

CP<br />

C’<br />

DP(0)<br />

D<br />

the<br />

D’<br />

NP<br />

N’<br />

N<br />

student<br />

TP<br />

T<br />

t<br />

T’<br />

DP<br />

t(0)<br />

V<br />

try<br />

v<br />

vP<br />

v<br />

v<br />

T<br />

-s<br />

v’<br />

T<br />

to<br />

V<br />

t<br />

VP<br />

V’<br />

TP<br />

T’<br />

DP<br />

D’<br />

D<br />

vP<br />

V<br />

laugh<br />

v<br />

v’<br />

v<br />

VP<br />

V’<br />

V<br />

t<br />

([],[],the student try -s to laugh):C<br />

[]::=>T C (the student,[],try -s to laugh):T<br />

([],[],try -s to laugh):+k T,([],the,student):-k<br />

-s::v==> +k T ([],try,to laugh):v,([],the,student):-k<br />

([],try,to laugh):=D v<br />

47 For historical reas<strong>on</strong>s, these verbs are sometimes also called “equi verbs.”<br />

218<br />

[]::=>V =D v ([],try,to laugh):V<br />

try::=T V ([],to,laugh):T<br />

to::=v T ([],laugh,[]):v<br />

([],laugh,[]):=D v<br />

[]::=>V =D v laugh::V<br />

([],the,student):D -k<br />

the::=N D -k student::N<br />

[]::D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!