Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013
Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013
Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BRASS TACKS<br />
Mr. Walsh,<br />
On page 37 of the print edition of<br />
<strong>Analog</strong> [March <strong>2013</strong>, “Spoof Worlds”<br />
by Kevin Walsh] you state that<br />
“. . . small amounts of carbon dioxide are<br />
needed by human beings to maintain the respiration<br />
process.” This is true but might be<br />
construed to imply that atmospheric carbon<br />
dioxide (CO ) is needed. As a matter of fact,<br />
2<br />
in closed environments (submarines, closed<br />
circuit diving, space craft, anesthesia circuits)<br />
great efforts are expended to assure<br />
that inspired CO levels are close to zero. Ele-<br />
2<br />
vated levels of CO can result in sedation,<br />
2<br />
loss of consciousness <strong>and</strong> death. Atmospheric<br />
carbon dioxide (while global levels are increasing)<br />
is essentially nil (hundreds of parts<br />
per million, I believe) with regard to breathing.<br />
CO , as a product of metabolism, dis-<br />
2<br />
solves in the blood <strong>and</strong> is carried to the<br />
brain’s respiratory center where it serves to<br />
stimulate respiration. The normal partial<br />
pressure of arterial CO is approximately<br />
2<br />
35–45 mmHg (this corresponds to approximately<br />
5 volumes per cent at sea level). Elimination<br />
of CO is in part diffusion dependent:<br />
2<br />
it is driven by the concentration gradient between<br />
lung <strong>and</strong> atmospheric concentration<br />
(the other part is minute ventilation).<br />
I apologize if you already possess this<br />
(simplified) information. I simply wished to<br />
point out this point of potential misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />
Thank you for your contribution to <strong>Analog</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> please accept my wishes for a happy <strong>and</strong><br />
healthy New Year.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Shepard Stone<br />
The author responds . . .<br />
Good point. Thanks for clearing up a<br />
source of potential confusion.<br />
104<br />
Dear <strong>Analog</strong>,<br />
I just finished reading the March <strong>2013</strong> editorial<br />
<strong>and</strong> wanted to convey my heart-felt<br />
“thank you” <strong>and</strong> best wishes for a long, happy<br />
<strong>and</strong> prosperous retirement to Dr. Schmidt.<br />
Dr. Schmidt, I think you have done an absolutely<br />
spectacular job of making <strong>and</strong> keeping<br />
<strong>Analog</strong> the excellent <strong>and</strong> entertaining<br />
publication it is. I definitely look forward to<br />
reading/hearing your future work.<br />
I also welcome Mr. Quachri <strong>and</strong> Ms. Hockaday<br />
<strong>and</strong> look forward to a continued long<br />
<strong>and</strong> happy relationship with you through<br />
<strong>Analog</strong>.<br />
Best regards to all,<br />
John Harcinske<br />
Mitchell, SD<br />
Dr. Schmidt,<br />
Thank you for all you have done during<br />
your years at <strong>Analog</strong>. And Mr. Quachri, congratulations<br />
on your appointment.<br />
I have been a regular reader for almost fifty<br />
years, <strong>and</strong> a subscriber for over forty years. I<br />
am retired from the NYS Department of Environmental<br />
Conservation <strong>and</strong> the NY Army<br />
National Guard. Environmental <strong>and</strong> military<br />
issues have long been my interest, <strong>and</strong> I have<br />
read many good stories on these subjects in<br />
<strong>Analog</strong>. Obviously, I would like to see more<br />
stories on these issues in the future, <strong>and</strong> am<br />
surprised at how few I have seen that address<br />
what we humans have been doing to this<br />
planet.<br />
I cheered when I read the editorials that<br />
address population issues, Dr. Schmidt is a<br />
rare voice on the subject that does not focus<br />
on the incredibly short sighted view that we<br />
need more population growth so we have<br />
enough young people to support us oldsters.<br />
More people, dem<strong>and</strong>ing a rising st<strong>and</strong>ard of<br />
living, will use more resources, <strong>and</strong> the plan-