20.07.2013 Views

Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013

Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013

Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BRASS TACKS<br />

Mr. Walsh,<br />

On page 37 of the print edition of<br />

<strong>Analog</strong> [March <strong>2013</strong>, “Spoof Worlds”<br />

by Kevin Walsh] you state that<br />

“. . . small amounts of carbon dioxide are<br />

needed by human beings to maintain the respiration<br />

process.” This is true but might be<br />

construed to imply that atmospheric carbon<br />

dioxide (CO ) is needed. As a matter of fact,<br />

2<br />

in closed environments (submarines, closed<br />

circuit diving, space craft, anesthesia circuits)<br />

great efforts are expended to assure<br />

that inspired CO levels are close to zero. Ele-<br />

2<br />

vated levels of CO can result in sedation,<br />

2<br />

loss of consciousness <strong>and</strong> death. Atmospheric<br />

carbon dioxide (while global levels are increasing)<br />

is essentially nil (hundreds of parts<br />

per million, I believe) with regard to breathing.<br />

CO , as a product of metabolism, dis-<br />

2<br />

solves in the blood <strong>and</strong> is carried to the<br />

brain’s respiratory center where it serves to<br />

stimulate respiration. The normal partial<br />

pressure of arterial CO is approximately<br />

2<br />

35–45 mmHg (this corresponds to approximately<br />

5 volumes per cent at sea level). Elimination<br />

of CO is in part diffusion dependent:<br />

2<br />

it is driven by the concentration gradient between<br />

lung <strong>and</strong> atmospheric concentration<br />

(the other part is minute ventilation).<br />

I apologize if you already possess this<br />

(simplified) information. I simply wished to<br />

point out this point of potential misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />

Thank you for your contribution to <strong>Analog</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> please accept my wishes for a happy <strong>and</strong><br />

healthy New Year.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Shepard Stone<br />

The author responds . . .<br />

Good point. Thanks for clearing up a<br />

source of potential confusion.<br />

104<br />

Dear <strong>Analog</strong>,<br />

I just finished reading the March <strong>2013</strong> editorial<br />

<strong>and</strong> wanted to convey my heart-felt<br />

“thank you” <strong>and</strong> best wishes for a long, happy<br />

<strong>and</strong> prosperous retirement to Dr. Schmidt.<br />

Dr. Schmidt, I think you have done an absolutely<br />

spectacular job of making <strong>and</strong> keeping<br />

<strong>Analog</strong> the excellent <strong>and</strong> entertaining<br />

publication it is. I definitely look forward to<br />

reading/hearing your future work.<br />

I also welcome Mr. Quachri <strong>and</strong> Ms. Hockaday<br />

<strong>and</strong> look forward to a continued long<br />

<strong>and</strong> happy relationship with you through<br />

<strong>Analog</strong>.<br />

Best regards to all,<br />

John Harcinske<br />

Mitchell, SD<br />

Dr. Schmidt,<br />

Thank you for all you have done during<br />

your years at <strong>Analog</strong>. And Mr. Quachri, congratulations<br />

on your appointment.<br />

I have been a regular reader for almost fifty<br />

years, <strong>and</strong> a subscriber for over forty years. I<br />

am retired from the NYS Department of Environmental<br />

Conservation <strong>and</strong> the NY Army<br />

National Guard. Environmental <strong>and</strong> military<br />

issues have long been my interest, <strong>and</strong> I have<br />

read many good stories on these subjects in<br />

<strong>Analog</strong>. Obviously, I would like to see more<br />

stories on these issues in the future, <strong>and</strong> am<br />

surprised at how few I have seen that address<br />

what we humans have been doing to this<br />

planet.<br />

I cheered when I read the editorials that<br />

address population issues, Dr. Schmidt is a<br />

rare voice on the subject that does not focus<br />

on the incredibly short sighted view that we<br />

need more population growth so we have<br />

enough young people to support us oldsters.<br />

More people, dem<strong>and</strong>ing a rising st<strong>and</strong>ard of<br />

living, will use more resources, <strong>and</strong> the plan-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!