Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013
Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013
Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANALOG<br />
top seventeen, in fact, if you include the Indian<br />
Ocean side of Indonesia, which may not<br />
border the Pacific but is part of the same tectonic<br />
region.<br />
Another high-danger part of that region lies<br />
offshore from Lima, Peru. “[Since] the Spanish<br />
conquest in 1543, Lima has been destroyed<br />
three times by a major earthquake with<br />
tsunamis,” says Emile Okal, a geophysicist<br />
from Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.<br />
“How large, we are not sure, but enough<br />
to completely wreck the city as it was built [at<br />
the time]. Now construction would be a bit<br />
better, but the population has increased tenfold<br />
or something, so I would put Lima as a<br />
city very much at risk.”<br />
Also at risk is Indonesia (<strong>and</strong> the same farflung<br />
regions of the Indian Ocean that were<br />
hard hit in 2004). At one level, that’s surprising,<br />
because classic tectonic theory says that<br />
earthquakes release long-accumulating strain.<br />
This means that a fault should not rupture<br />
again in the same place until enough time has<br />
passed for strain to re-accumulate.<br />
But faults appear to come in segments, <strong>and</strong><br />
an earthquake in one segment can transfer<br />
stress to adjacent ones. And, while Indonesia<br />
has seen more than its share of giant earthquakes,<br />
one segment of the Sunda Subduction<br />
Zone—the fault that generated both the 2004<br />
Indian Ocean tsunami <strong>and</strong> a subsequent magnitude<br />
8.6 earthquake nearby—hasn’t seen a<br />
major earthquake since 1833 . . . <strong>and</strong> even that<br />
earthquake may have released only a portion<br />
of the accumulating strain.<br />
That segment lies offshore of the densely<br />
populated city of Padang, which is several<br />
times larger than B<strong>and</strong>a Aceh, the largest Indonesian<br />
city hit by the 2004 tsunami. “There<br />
are places where we know of very large historical<br />
earthquakes that are more or less ripe<br />
for [another],” says Okal. “I would put Padang<br />
as [such] a bad place.”<br />
Other “bad” places circle much of the Ring<br />
of Fire. For example, Okal says, there may still<br />
be strain to be released in northern Chile. “We<br />
know there was one earthquake [there] in<br />
1877, <strong>and</strong> a smaller one in 1922,” he says.<br />
“But there is the possibility [of another].”<br />
Moving north, he notes that Mazatlán, Mex-<br />
ico, could be at risk, though probably not of a<br />
mega-quake (magnitude 9). Similarly, southern<br />
California doesn’t seem likely to have a giant<br />
subduction-zone earthquake, though, of<br />
course, it’s always vulnerable to waves coming<br />
from far afield. And, as we’ll discuss later,<br />
subduction zone temblors aren’t the only<br />
source of tsunamis.<br />
Continuing to move north, we hit Cascadia,<br />
then Alaska, where the giant “Good Friday”<br />
earthquake of 1964 (magnitude 9.2) unleashed<br />
a tsunami that killed people as far<br />
away as Crescent City, California. But that was<br />
less than fifty years ago <strong>and</strong> it’s unlikely that<br />
enough stress for a repeat will reaccumulate<br />
anytime soon.<br />
Better primed for big earthquakes are the<br />
Aleutian Isl<strong>and</strong>s, parts of which, Okal says,<br />
haven’t seen large earthquakes since 1788.<br />
“But they are very lightly populated.” Still, he<br />
notes, a big earthquake here could beam<br />
tsunami waves toward Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> other<br />
parts of California. “This is a scenario which is<br />
considered by some people [to be] a major<br />
priority in terms of hazard assessment on the<br />
U.S. West Coast,” he says.<br />
Other parts of the Aleutians, he adds, could<br />
produce a tsunami that “would strike Hawaii<br />
pretty badly.”<br />
Continuing around the Ring of Fire, Kamchatka,<br />
Russia, had a huge earthquake in 1952<br />
(variously reported as magnitude 8.2 to 9.0)<br />
that produced a tsunami whose effects the Soviet<br />
Union long kept secret. “It killed upward<br />
of seventeen thous<strong>and</strong> people,” Okal says. But<br />
here, too, the strain has probably been fully<br />
released, making a near-future repeat unlikely.<br />
Moving to Japan, the best thing that can be<br />
said is that the fault zone that produced the<br />
2011 earthquake is probably safe for hundreds<br />
of years. But there’s always the threat of a big<br />
tsunami from other areas hitting Tokyo, as<br />
happened in 1923, when one hundred thous<strong>and</strong><br />
died, with another forty thous<strong>and</strong> missing.<br />
8 Farther south, Okal adds, the big<br />
question is a fault zone known as the Nankai<br />
Trough. “Some parts are ripe for rupture,” he<br />
says.<br />
Continuing south, the Ryukyu Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
(which run from Japan to Taiwan) appear to<br />
8 Not all, or even most, of these people died from the tsunami. The earthquake produced fires, which swept<br />
through the city, killing tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s. A subsequent typhoon added to the misery, <strong>and</strong> the death toll.<br />
20 RICHARD A. LOVETT