20.07.2013 Views

Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013

Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013

Analog Science Fiction and Fact - June 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANALOG<br />

top seventeen, in fact, if you include the Indian<br />

Ocean side of Indonesia, which may not<br />

border the Pacific but is part of the same tectonic<br />

region.<br />

Another high-danger part of that region lies<br />

offshore from Lima, Peru. “[Since] the Spanish<br />

conquest in 1543, Lima has been destroyed<br />

three times by a major earthquake with<br />

tsunamis,” says Emile Okal, a geophysicist<br />

from Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.<br />

“How large, we are not sure, but enough<br />

to completely wreck the city as it was built [at<br />

the time]. Now construction would be a bit<br />

better, but the population has increased tenfold<br />

or something, so I would put Lima as a<br />

city very much at risk.”<br />

Also at risk is Indonesia (<strong>and</strong> the same farflung<br />

regions of the Indian Ocean that were<br />

hard hit in 2004). At one level, that’s surprising,<br />

because classic tectonic theory says that<br />

earthquakes release long-accumulating strain.<br />

This means that a fault should not rupture<br />

again in the same place until enough time has<br />

passed for strain to re-accumulate.<br />

But faults appear to come in segments, <strong>and</strong><br />

an earthquake in one segment can transfer<br />

stress to adjacent ones. And, while Indonesia<br />

has seen more than its share of giant earthquakes,<br />

one segment of the Sunda Subduction<br />

Zone—the fault that generated both the 2004<br />

Indian Ocean tsunami <strong>and</strong> a subsequent magnitude<br />

8.6 earthquake nearby—hasn’t seen a<br />

major earthquake since 1833 . . . <strong>and</strong> even that<br />

earthquake may have released only a portion<br />

of the accumulating strain.<br />

That segment lies offshore of the densely<br />

populated city of Padang, which is several<br />

times larger than B<strong>and</strong>a Aceh, the largest Indonesian<br />

city hit by the 2004 tsunami. “There<br />

are places where we know of very large historical<br />

earthquakes that are more or less ripe<br />

for [another],” says Okal. “I would put Padang<br />

as [such] a bad place.”<br />

Other “bad” places circle much of the Ring<br />

of Fire. For example, Okal says, there may still<br />

be strain to be released in northern Chile. “We<br />

know there was one earthquake [there] in<br />

1877, <strong>and</strong> a smaller one in 1922,” he says.<br />

“But there is the possibility [of another].”<br />

Moving north, he notes that Mazatlán, Mex-<br />

ico, could be at risk, though probably not of a<br />

mega-quake (magnitude 9). Similarly, southern<br />

California doesn’t seem likely to have a giant<br />

subduction-zone earthquake, though, of<br />

course, it’s always vulnerable to waves coming<br />

from far afield. And, as we’ll discuss later,<br />

subduction zone temblors aren’t the only<br />

source of tsunamis.<br />

Continuing to move north, we hit Cascadia,<br />

then Alaska, where the giant “Good Friday”<br />

earthquake of 1964 (magnitude 9.2) unleashed<br />

a tsunami that killed people as far<br />

away as Crescent City, California. But that was<br />

less than fifty years ago <strong>and</strong> it’s unlikely that<br />

enough stress for a repeat will reaccumulate<br />

anytime soon.<br />

Better primed for big earthquakes are the<br />

Aleutian Isl<strong>and</strong>s, parts of which, Okal says,<br />

haven’t seen large earthquakes since 1788.<br />

“But they are very lightly populated.” Still, he<br />

notes, a big earthquake here could beam<br />

tsunami waves toward Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> other<br />

parts of California. “This is a scenario which is<br />

considered by some people [to be] a major<br />

priority in terms of hazard assessment on the<br />

U.S. West Coast,” he says.<br />

Other parts of the Aleutians, he adds, could<br />

produce a tsunami that “would strike Hawaii<br />

pretty badly.”<br />

Continuing around the Ring of Fire, Kamchatka,<br />

Russia, had a huge earthquake in 1952<br />

(variously reported as magnitude 8.2 to 9.0)<br />

that produced a tsunami whose effects the Soviet<br />

Union long kept secret. “It killed upward<br />

of seventeen thous<strong>and</strong> people,” Okal says. But<br />

here, too, the strain has probably been fully<br />

released, making a near-future repeat unlikely.<br />

Moving to Japan, the best thing that can be<br />

said is that the fault zone that produced the<br />

2011 earthquake is probably safe for hundreds<br />

of years. But there’s always the threat of a big<br />

tsunami from other areas hitting Tokyo, as<br />

happened in 1923, when one hundred thous<strong>and</strong><br />

died, with another forty thous<strong>and</strong> missing.<br />

8 Farther south, Okal adds, the big<br />

question is a fault zone known as the Nankai<br />

Trough. “Some parts are ripe for rupture,” he<br />

says.<br />

Continuing south, the Ryukyu Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

(which run from Japan to Taiwan) appear to<br />

8 Not all, or even most, of these people died from the tsunami. The earthquake produced fires, which swept<br />

through the city, killing tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s. A subsequent typhoon added to the misery, <strong>and</strong> the death toll.<br />

20 RICHARD A. LOVETT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!