Cuyahoga County: Public Safety Answering Point ... - Cleveland.com
Cuyahoga County: Public Safety Answering Point ... - Cleveland.com
Cuyahoga County: Public Safety Answering Point ... - Cleveland.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Cuyahoga</strong> <strong>County</strong>: PSAP Assessment<br />
Entity Name Pros Cons<br />
West<strong>com</strong> Space for two (2)<br />
additional workstations<br />
and dispatchers<br />
Executive-level support.<br />
Council of Governments<br />
(COG) is in place and has<br />
the support of<br />
participating mayors.<br />
Current CAD vendor<br />
(Positron) is not an<br />
enterprise-class system.<br />
As of December 2011,<br />
entity is not able to absorb<br />
significant additional<br />
volume for a disaster<br />
recovery site.<br />
Currently, no one entity could absorb all of the disaster recovery (DR)<br />
requirements of the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong>. Several options, however, do exist for<br />
planned PSAPs consolidations.<br />
1. The planned, consolidated PSAPs (SouthEast, SouthWest, Solon/Chagrin<br />
Valley, West<strong>com</strong>) could invest in building several additional workstations<br />
into their facilities, dispersing the calls in a failover plan across several<br />
new regional PSAPs.<br />
For example, Regional PSAP X could take <strong>Cleveland</strong> Police District One’s<br />
calls in an emergency situation, while PSAP Y would take <strong>Cleveland</strong> Police<br />
District Two’s calls and so on. Load balancing is a viable solution to<br />
properly route calls and balance call volume.<br />
2. Solon/Chagrin Valley has discussed the possibility of building a new standalone<br />
PSAP facility. Additionally capacity could provide DR capabilities for<br />
the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong>. The standalone facility would require support and<br />
funding from the <strong>County</strong>.<br />
Note: These would both require additional funding from either the City of<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> or <strong>County</strong>.<br />
Page 34