Promotion
Promotion
Promotion
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OLDER PEOPLE: THE RETIREMENT YEARS 193<br />
social contact aspect of communal gardening has major effects on older individuals’<br />
sense of worth and mental well-being (Milligan et al. 2005).<br />
Reminiscence<br />
For the past 30 years reminiscence has become an almost natural part of activities<br />
in care work. For anyone particularly interested in reminiscence and life review,<br />
Coleman and O’Hanlon (2004) provide a comprehensive overview of the historical<br />
background, types, functions and evaluations of reminiscence with older people. Reminiscence<br />
enables older people to recall past events and life experiences, while life<br />
review focuses on the individual’s past life as a whole. Reminiscence is conducted in<br />
groups or on a one to one basis. It is used for a variety of reasons, for example to find<br />
meaning and purpose in life, to reduce boredom, to teach and inform. It has been used<br />
therapeutically, to deal with depression and traumatic memories, with residents in<br />
sheltered housing to improve well-being, and with demented older people. Interestingly,<br />
it would seem that some ethnic groups utilize reminiscence more than others,<br />
although as Coleman and O’Hanlon (2004) point out, it is not clear whether this is<br />
because some cultures have a stronger oral tradition or because these groups have a<br />
greater need to promote self-understanding, preserve identity and educate ensuing<br />
generations.<br />
Carers’ support<br />
There is a large body of research which has evaluated ways of improving the mental<br />
well-being of those who care for frail older people, older people with Alzheimer’s disease<br />
and dementia. The main types of interventions that have been evaluated include<br />
respite care, psycho-social interventions, group education and support. So far there is<br />
little evidence that any of these interventions result in significant long-term improvements<br />
in stress, distress, coping skills, depression or anxiety (McNally et al. 1999; Pusey<br />
and Richards 2001; Cattan et al. 2005). McNally et al. (1999) suggest that the lack of<br />
evidence may be because although respite provides immediate relief from caring duties,<br />
it fails to help maintain socially supportive relationships, which are needed once respite<br />
has come to an end. A more carer-centred approach, they say would take into<br />
account factors such as the carer-patient relationship, the carer’s active social networks,<br />
the effect of respite on the care recipient, the carer’s attitude to respite, any feelings of<br />
guilt, and the level of self-efficacy with regards to their ability to make use of the respite<br />
time. Their suggestions are in part supported by research, which has shown that the<br />
carer–cared-for relationship improves more in one to one support and carer burden is<br />
reduced through cognitive-behavioural interventions (including education, stress<br />
management and coping skills). However, in one study carers attending supportive<br />
group activities guided by peer leaders demonstrated a significant increase in network<br />
size (and consequently a reduction in social isolation) one year after the intervention<br />
(Toseland et al. 1990). There is some indication that psycho-social interventions that<br />
include the use of problem-solving and a behavioural component may be effective with<br />
carers of people with dementia (Pusey and Richards 2001). Although these interventions<br />
show some promise in providing support for carers Marriott et al. (2000) note that<br />
the implementation of the cognitive-behavioural intervention is lengthy and therefore<br />
has resource implications and requires specialist training. Such critical observations