23.07.2013 Views

Promotion

Promotion

Promotion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

differing areas of life. In most Western societies adolescence is designated as a period<br />

between childhood and adulthood. There have been debates about whether the period<br />

of childhood has always been recognized or whether it is essentially a modern concept<br />

(Aries 1962; Pollock 1983 in Hunt 2005: 85). In general there is now broad support for<br />

the view that there are differing ideas of children and childhood across cultures, and<br />

that ideas have changed over time.<br />

Contrasting ideas of the essential nature of a child as either ‘good’ or ‘evil’ have run<br />

through Western cultures (Stainton-Rogers 2001). Where the child was seen as ‘good’,<br />

childhood was a period of innocence in which children developed self-knowledge and<br />

needed an environment offering protection against the wider world in which to grow<br />

and develop. Childhood was important in its own right, not simply a period of preparation<br />

for adult life. These ideas have influenced much pre-school education where<br />

children are encouraged to express themselves through free play and creative work<br />

within a facilitating and protecting environment. While the general need for protection<br />

of young children would not be challenged, questions can be asked about the<br />

nature and degree of protection that they need and the appropriate balance between<br />

protection and gradual exposure to risks.<br />

Contrasting conceptions of the child as ‘evil’, ‘wicked’ or ‘naughty’ have influenced<br />

views on the purpose and process of socialization. In enabling the child to become<br />

‘socialized’ or ‘saved’ (within a religious perspective) discipline and punishment were<br />

seen as essential to the process. By the nineteenth century, children were more likely to<br />

be described as ‘naughty’ rather than as ‘evil’, but the emphasis on discipline prevailed<br />

(Stainton-Rogers 2001). The idea of the ‘naughty’ child, often in opposition to the<br />

‘good’ one, continues to be a feature of popular discourse on children and evidence can<br />

also be seen in the media and children’s literature.<br />

Childhood in the disciplines of psychology and sociology<br />

INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD 65<br />

Concepts and theories from the various schools in psychology and sociology are<br />

continuing influences on thinking and practice in mental health promotion. From<br />

psychology there are, for example, theories on the ways that children learn and their<br />

role in the learning process; how their understanding of the world develops; and how<br />

they develop emotionally and socially. Theories of development have addressed cognitive<br />

(Piaget, in Grieve and Hughes 1990: 26–50); moral (Kohlberg 1963, in Danziger<br />

1971: 97); and socio-emotional (Erikson 1963; Bowlby 1971) aspects with critical<br />

periods identified for some of them. Attachment theory which focused on the development<br />

of emotional attachments through the process of bonding has had a strong<br />

influence on thinking about early mental health (Winnicott 1964; Bowlby 1971). The<br />

process was seen as important not only for mental health in childhood, but also as a<br />

foundation for relationships throughout life. There are a number of questions which<br />

have run through developmental psychology:<br />

• Is the child active or passive in the development process? In contrast with the<br />

relatively passive conceptions held by the behaviourists others such as the social<br />

interactionists depicted the child as an ‘active agent’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!