25.07.2013 Views

ERCOFTAC Bulletin - Centre Acoustique

ERCOFTAC Bulletin - Centre Acoustique

ERCOFTAC Bulletin - Centre Acoustique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for 0.3 ≤ St ≤ 0.5. Results are shown in Figure (7),<br />

taken from [5], and are compared to the axisymmetric<br />

mode of the pressure for the same frequency range. The<br />

agreement found at low angles (high x1 in Figure (7))<br />

between the models with “unsteady envelope”, i.e. when<br />

temporal changes of A and L follow the simulation data,<br />

is reasonable for both computations.<br />

(a)<br />

SPL (dB)<br />

(b)<br />

SPL (dB)<br />

125<br />

120<br />

115<br />

110<br />

105<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

DNS<br />

Steady envelope<br />

Unsteady envelope (analytical)<br />

Unsteady envelope (numerical)<br />

85<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

125<br />

120<br />

115<br />

110<br />

105<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

x1/D<br />

LES<br />

Steady envelope<br />

Unsteady envelope (analytical)<br />

Unsteady envelope (numerical)<br />

85<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

x1/D<br />

Figure 7: Comparison between jittering wave-packet<br />

models and numerical data of Mach 0.9 jets: (a) DNS<br />

(Freund[14]) and (b) LES (Daviller[12]). SPL taken<br />

for the axisymmetric mode of the acoustic pressure for<br />

0.3 ≤ St ≤ 0.5. Taken from [5].<br />

6 Conclusions<br />

The results reviewed in the present paper show that the<br />

sound field at low axial angles from subsonic jets can<br />

be calculated using source models consisting of a train<br />

of axisymmetric structures that undergo an amplitude<br />

modulation. This has been accomplished both using experimental<br />

data, for which the source is modelled as linear<br />

instability waves, or numerical simulations that allow<br />

the use of full volume data for the velocity field.<br />

The current progress in both numerical simulations<br />

and measurement techniques can guide us further<br />

into the nature of the low azimuthal modes in free<br />

jets. Although a detailed characterisation of the full<br />

turbulent field seems to be a hard task, focus on<br />

the axisymmetric and on other low azimuthal modes<br />

allows considerable simplifications. Such modes have a<br />

relatively low energy level if compared to the overall<br />

turbulent fluctuations[30], but their higher acoustic<br />

efficiency can lead to significant sound radiation.<br />

The present work was supported by CNPq, National<br />

Council of Scientific and Technological Development –<br />

Brazil. The authors thank Daniel Rodríguez and Tim<br />

Colonius for the helpful discussions and for the PSE calculations.<br />

References<br />

[1] G. K. Batchelor and A. E. Gill. Analysis of the<br />

stability of axisymmetric jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,<br />

14(04):529–551, 1962.<br />

[2] C. Brown and J. Bridges. Acoustic efficiency of azimuthal<br />

modes in jet noise using chevron nozzles.<br />

Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space<br />

Administration, 2006.<br />

[3] G. L. Brown and A. Roshko. On density effects and<br />

large structure in turbulent mixing layers. Journal<br />

of Fluid Mechanics, 64(4):775–816, 1974.<br />

[4] G. Broze and F. Hussain. Nonlinear dynamics of<br />

forced transitional jets: periodic and chaotic attractors.<br />

Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 263:93–132, 1994.<br />

[5] A. V. G. Cavalieri, P. Jordan, A. Agarwal, and<br />

Y. Gervais. Jittering wave-packet models for subsonic<br />

jet noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration,<br />

330(18-19):4474–4492, 2011.<br />

[6] A. V. G. Cavalieri, P. Jordan, T. Colonius, and<br />

Y. Gervais. Axisymmetric superdirectivity in subsonic<br />

jets. In 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference<br />

and Exhibit, Portland, OR, USA, June 5-8<br />

2011.<br />

[7] D. G. Crighton. Basic principles of aerodynamic<br />

noise generation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences,<br />

16(1):31–96, 1975.<br />

[8] D. G. Crighton and M. Gaster. Stability of slowly<br />

diverging jet flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,<br />

77(2):397–413, 1976.<br />

[9] D. G. Crighton and P. Huerre. Shear-layer pressure<br />

fluctuations and superdirective acoustic sources.<br />

Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 220:355–368, 1990.<br />

[10] S. C. Crow. Acoustic gain of a turbulent jet. In<br />

Phys. Soc. Meeting, Univ. Colorado, Boulder, paper<br />

IE, volume 6, 1972.<br />

[11] S. C. Crow and F. H. Champagne. Orderly structure<br />

in jet turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,<br />

48(3):547–591, 1971.<br />

[12] G. Daviller. Etude numérique des effets de temperature<br />

dans les jets simples et coaxiaux. PhD<br />

thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Mécanique et<br />

d’Aérotechnique, Poitiers, France (in French), 2010.<br />

[13] J. E. Ffowcs Williams and A. J. Kempton. The<br />

noise from the large-scale structure of a jet. Journal<br />

of Fluid Mechanics, 84(4):673–694, 1978.<br />

[14] J. B. Freund. Noise sources in a low-Reynoldsnumber<br />

turbulent jet at Mach 0.9. Journal of Fluid<br />

Mechanics, 438:277–305, 2001.<br />

38 <strong>ERCOFTAC</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> 90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!