Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...
Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...
Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
cating the robustness of our procedure.<br />
6.4 ProblemDS1<br />
Thisproblemhas10upperand10lowerlevelvariables. Thus,anoverallpopulationof<br />
size Nu = 400 is used here. For this problem, we first consider τ = 1. Figure 19 shows<br />
the obtained archive solutions for a typical run. It is worth mentioning here that this<br />
problemwaspossibletobesolveduptoonlysixvariables(intotal)byourearlierfixed<br />
BLEMOapproach(Deb and Sinha, 2009a). But here with our hybrid and self-adaptive<br />
approach, we are able to solve 20-variable version of the problem. Later, we present<br />
results with40variablesas well for this problem.<br />
F2<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />
F1<br />
0.8 1 1.2<br />
Figure 19: Final archive solutions for<br />
problemDS1.<br />
F2<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />
F1<br />
0.8 1 1.2<br />
Figure 20: Attainment surfaces(0%, 50%<br />
and100%)forproblemDS1from21runs.<br />
The attainment surface plots in Figure 20 further show the robustness of the proposed<br />
algorithm. The hypervolumes for the obtained attainment surfaces are 0.7812,<br />
0.7984and0.7992,withamaximumdifferenceofabout2%. Theparametricstudywith<br />
Nu in Figure 21 shows that Nu = 400 is the best choice in terms of achieving a similar<br />
performance on the hypervolume measure using the smallest number of function<br />
evaluations,thereby supporting our setting Nu = 20n.<br />
Sincethis problemismore difficultcomparedtothepreviousproblems (TP1,TP2,<br />
andTP4),we investigatethe effectofself-adaptivechanges inlower levelNSGA-IIparameters<br />
(Nl and tl) with the generation counter. In the left side plot of Figure 22, we<br />
show the average value of these two parameters for every upper level generation (T)<br />
from a typical simulation run. It is interesting to note that, starting with an average<br />
of 20 members in each lower level subpopulation, the number reduces with generation<br />
counter, meaning that smaller population sizes are needed for later lower level<br />
simulations. The average subpopulation size reduces to its lower permissible value<br />
of four in 32 generations. Occasional increase in average Nl indicates that an upper<br />
level variable vector may have been found near a previously undiscovered region of<br />
the Pareto-optimal front. The hybrid algorithm increases its lower level population to<br />
explorethe regionbetterinsuchoccasions.<br />
Thevariationofnumberoflowerlevelgenerations(tl)beforeterminationalsofollows<br />
a similar trend, except that at the end only 3-9 generations are required to fulfill<br />
101