30.07.2013 Views

Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...

Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...

Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstract<br />

Aalto University, P.O. Box 11000, FI-00076 Aalto www.aalto.fi<br />

Author<br />

Ankur Sinha<br />

Name of the doctoral dissertation<br />

<strong>Progressively</strong> <strong>Interactive</strong> <strong>Evolutionary</strong> <strong>Multi</strong>objective <strong>Optimization</strong><br />

Publisher Aalto University School of Economics<br />

Unit Department of Business Technology<br />

Series Aalto University publication series DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS 17/2011<br />

Field of research Decision Making and <strong>Optimization</strong><br />

Abstract<br />

A complete optimization procedure for a multi-objective problem essentially comprises of<br />

search and decision making. Depending upon how the search and decision making task is<br />

integrated, algorithms can be classified into various categories. Following `a decision making<br />

after search' approach, which is common with evolutionary multi-objective optimization<br />

algorithms, requires to produce all the possible alternatives before a decision can be taken.<br />

This, with the intricacies involved in producing the entire Pareto-front, is not a wise approach<br />

for high objective problems. Rather, for such kind of problems, the most preferred point on the<br />

front should be the target. In this study we propose and evaluate algorithms where search and<br />

decision making tasks work in tandem and the most preferred solution is the outcome. For the<br />

two tasks to work simultaneously, an interaction of the decision maker with the algorithm is<br />

necessary, therefore, preference information from the decision maker is accepted periodically<br />

by the algorithm and progress towards the most preferred point is made.<br />

Two different progressively interactive procedures have been suggested in the dissertation<br />

which can be integrated with any existing evolutionary multi-objective optimization<br />

algorithm to improve its effectiveness in handling high objective problems by making it<br />

capable to accept preference information at the intermediate steps of the algorithm. A number<br />

of high objective un-constrained as well as constrained problems have been successfully<br />

solved using the procedures. One of the less explored and difficult domains, i.e., bilevel multiobjective<br />

optimization has also been targeted and a solution methodology has been proposed.<br />

Initially, the bilevel multi-objective optimization problem has been solved by developing a<br />

hybrid bilevel evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. Thereafter, the<br />

progressively interactive procedure has been incorporated in the algorithm leading to an<br />

increased accuracy and savings in computational cost. The efficacy of using a progressively<br />

interactive approach for solving difficult multi-objective problems has, therefore, further been<br />

justified.<br />

Keywords <strong>Evolutionary</strong> multi-objective optimization algorithms, multiple criteria decisionmaking,<br />

interactive multi-objective optimization algorithms, bilevel optimization<br />

ISBN (printed) 978-952-60-4052-3 ISBN (pdf) 978-952-60-4053-0<br />

ISSN-L 1799-4934 ISSN (printed) 1799-4934 ISSN (pdf) 1799-4942<br />

Pages 135 Location of publisher Espoo Location of printing Helsinki Year 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!