Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...
Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...
Progressively Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 Introduction<br />
Many real-world applications of multi-objective optimization involve a<br />
high number of objectives. Existing evolutionary multi-objective optimization<br />
algorithms [7, 34] have been applied to problems having multiple<br />
objectives for the task of finding a well-representative set of Paretooptimal<br />
solutions [6, 4]. These methods have been successful in solving a<br />
wide variety of problems with two or three objectives. However, these<br />
methodologies tend to fail for high number of objectives (greater than<br />
three) [8, 22]. The major hindrances in handling high number of objectives<br />
relate to stagnation in search, increased dimensionality of Pareto-optimal<br />
front, large computational cost, and difficulty in visualization of the objective<br />
space. These difficulties are inherent to a multi-objective problem<br />
having a high number of dimensions and cannot be eliminated; rather,<br />
procedures to handle such difficulties need to be explored.<br />
In many of the existing methodologies, preference information from<br />
the decision maker is utilized before the beginning of the search process<br />
or at the end of the search process to produce the optimal solution(s) in<br />
a multi-objective problem. Some approaches interact with the decision<br />
maker and iterate the process of elicitation and search until a satisfactory<br />
solution is found. However, not many studies have been performed where<br />
preference information is elicited during the search process and the information<br />
is utilized to progressively proceed towards the most preferred<br />
solution.<br />
This dissertation is an effort towards development of progressively interactive<br />
procedures to handle difficult multi-objective problems, combining<br />
concepts from the fields of <strong>Evolutionary</strong> <strong>Multi</strong>-objective <strong>Optimization</strong><br />
(EMO) and <strong>Multi</strong> Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The fields of <strong>Evolutionary</strong><br />
<strong>Multi</strong>-objective <strong>Optimization</strong> and <strong>Multi</strong> Criteria Decision Making<br />
have a common goal, but researchers have shown only lukewarm interest,<br />
until recently, in applying the principles of one field to the other. In<br />
the dissertation, emphasis has been placed on integration of methods and<br />
development of hybrid procedures that are helpful in the extension of the<br />
existing algorithms to handle challenging problems with multiple objec-<br />
3