Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16<br />
NCKRI Special Paper No. 1<br />
confining beds, but also on the tectonic regime of a region.<br />
The uplift trend and the neotectonic activity favor crossformational<br />
communications between aquifers.<br />
Cross-formational hydraulic communication is one of<br />
the most important factors determining the resources and<br />
chemical composition of groundwaters in the upper<br />
hydrogeodynamic stories of sedimentary basins. It has<br />
been largely overlooked in karst hydrogeology and<br />
speleogenetic studies. It obviously has an immense<br />
importance, and provides a broad perspective for<br />
implications to hypogenic speleogenesis. The above<br />
described regularities of basinal hydraulics determine<br />
locations of zones particularly favorable for speleogenesis.<br />
The place of hypogenic speleogenesis within a basinal<br />
flow domain is shown in Figure 1. It is commonly<br />
associated with discharge segments of regional or<br />
intermediate flow systems. But arguments throughout this<br />
book, supported by numerous field examples worldwide,<br />
strongly suggest that this association is largely because<br />
hypogenic transverse speleogenesis creates these discharge<br />
segments, making them recognizable at the regional scale,<br />
by greatly enhancing initially available cross-formational<br />
permeability structures or even by creating new efficient<br />
ones. The profound effect of a high permeability rock unit<br />
on the regional flow pattern was demonstrated<br />
theoretically by Freeze and Witherspoon (1967) and<br />
validated by many regional hydrogeologic studies. In<br />
basins containing soluble formations, the primary result of<br />
speleogenesis is converging groundwater flow to zones<br />
where ascending cross-formational communication is<br />
greatly enhanced by speleogenesis.<br />
3.2 Hydrostratigraphic conversion of soluble<br />
formations<br />
The hydrostratigraphy of a sedimentary succession is<br />
determined mainly by the relative permeabilities of the<br />
rock units. Aquifers are separated from each other and<br />
from the upper unconfined aquifer by low-permeability<br />
beds. Initial matrix permeabilities of common porous<br />
aquifers (e.g. many medium- to coarse-grained clastic<br />
sediments) are normally several orders of magnitude<br />
greater then that of soluble rocks such as massive<br />
limestones or sulfates prior to speleogenesis. Soluble<br />
formations are commonly vertically conterminous with<br />
formations with initially higher permeability and serve as<br />
intervening beds (aquitards) in a multiple-aquifer system.<br />
However, they change their hydrostratigraphic role to<br />
karstic aquifers in the course of speleogenetic evolution.<br />
As tectonism and uplift impose fracture permeability,<br />
intervening soluble units increasingly transmit<br />
groundwater between (non-karstic) aquifers in zones of<br />
sufficient head gradients. According to Girinsky's (1947)<br />
premise, flow in separating beds is predominantly vertical,<br />
so speleogenesis evolves in transverse communication<br />
paths across the soluble formation. When conduit systems<br />
are developed within soluble formations, conventional<br />
karst wisdom views the situation as a karst aquifer<br />
sandwiched between relative aquitards, without<br />
appreciating that the initial conditions were quite the<br />
opposite (Figure 6). Failure to recognize the proper<br />
relationships commonly causes reverse misconceptions in<br />
hydrostratigraphic interpretations of layered systems:<br />
soluble units, particularly evaporites, may be treated as<br />
impervious beds (aquitards) in a system, or they may be<br />
regarded “by definition” as karstified media.<br />
Switching of hydrogeological functions of different<br />
beds in a sequence during the speleogenetic evolution of<br />
the soluble ones is quite common in confined settings<br />
(Klimchouk, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996b, 2000a; Lowe,<br />
1992). This is because changes in permeability of soluble<br />
units through time are much more dynamic and drastic<br />
than changes in non-soluble beds. However, it is important<br />
to recognize that hydraulic properties of karst aquifers<br />
evolved in response to hypogenic transverse speleogenesis,<br />
and are characteristically different from epigenic karst<br />
aquifers, the aspects further discussed in the next three<br />
sections.<br />
Figure 6. Conversion of the hydrogeological function of a soluble<br />
bed in a multiple-aquifer system in the course of speleogenesis<br />
(from Klimchouk, 1996b).<br />
3.3 The concept of transverse speleogenesis<br />
In unconfined settings, early conduit development<br />
occurs by lateral flow through an aquifer, from the input<br />
boundary to the output boundary. Furthermore, it was<br />
commonly implied that water flows along the long<br />
dimension of fractures, which are commonly arranged<br />
laterally relative to bedding (Figure 7), or along pathways<br />
that combine long dimensions of several laterally<br />
connected fissures. Long flow lengths and therefore low<br />
discharge/length ratios (sensu Palmer, 1991) are inferred in<br />
such a configuration, which is commonly used in modeling<br />
of early conduit development. Similarly, the parameter of<br />
passage length, or cave development, derived from<br />
speleological mapping, tacitly implies the meaning of the