03.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

NCKRI Special Paper No. 1<br />

confining beds, but also on the tectonic regime of a region.<br />

The uplift trend and the neotectonic activity favor crossformational<br />

communications between aquifers.<br />

Cross-formational hydraulic communication is one of<br />

the most important factors determining the resources and<br />

chemical composition of groundwaters in the upper<br />

hydrogeodynamic stories of sedimentary basins. It has<br />

been largely overlooked in karst hydrogeology and<br />

speleogenetic studies. It obviously has an immense<br />

importance, and provides a broad perspective for<br />

implications to hypogenic speleogenesis. The above<br />

described regularities of basinal hydraulics determine<br />

locations of zones particularly favorable for speleogenesis.<br />

The place of hypogenic speleogenesis within a basinal<br />

flow domain is shown in Figure 1. It is commonly<br />

associated with discharge segments of regional or<br />

intermediate flow systems. But arguments throughout this<br />

book, supported by numerous field examples worldwide,<br />

strongly suggest that this association is largely because<br />

hypogenic transverse speleogenesis creates these discharge<br />

segments, making them recognizable at the regional scale,<br />

by greatly enhancing initially available cross-formational<br />

permeability structures or even by creating new efficient<br />

ones. The profound effect of a high permeability rock unit<br />

on the regional flow pattern was demonstrated<br />

theoretically by Freeze and Witherspoon (1967) and<br />

validated by many regional hydrogeologic studies. In<br />

basins containing soluble formations, the primary result of<br />

speleogenesis is converging groundwater flow to zones<br />

where ascending cross-formational communication is<br />

greatly enhanced by speleogenesis.<br />

3.2 Hydrostratigraphic conversion of soluble<br />

formations<br />

The hydrostratigraphy of a sedimentary succession is<br />

determined mainly by the relative permeabilities of the<br />

rock units. Aquifers are separated from each other and<br />

from the upper unconfined aquifer by low-permeability<br />

beds. Initial matrix permeabilities of common porous<br />

aquifers (e.g. many medium- to coarse-grained clastic<br />

sediments) are normally several orders of magnitude<br />

greater then that of soluble rocks such as massive<br />

limestones or sulfates prior to speleogenesis. Soluble<br />

formations are commonly vertically conterminous with<br />

formations with initially higher permeability and serve as<br />

intervening beds (aquitards) in a multiple-aquifer system.<br />

However, they change their hydrostratigraphic role to<br />

karstic aquifers in the course of speleogenetic evolution.<br />

As tectonism and uplift impose fracture permeability,<br />

intervening soluble units increasingly transmit<br />

groundwater between (non-karstic) aquifers in zones of<br />

sufficient head gradients. According to Girinsky's (1947)<br />

premise, flow in separating beds is predominantly vertical,<br />

so speleogenesis evolves in transverse communication<br />

paths across the soluble formation. When conduit systems<br />

are developed within soluble formations, conventional<br />

karst wisdom views the situation as a karst aquifer<br />

sandwiched between relative aquitards, without<br />

appreciating that the initial conditions were quite the<br />

opposite (Figure 6). Failure to recognize the proper<br />

relationships commonly causes reverse misconceptions in<br />

hydrostratigraphic interpretations of layered systems:<br />

soluble units, particularly evaporites, may be treated as<br />

impervious beds (aquitards) in a system, or they may be<br />

regarded “by definition” as karstified media.<br />

Switching of hydrogeological functions of different<br />

beds in a sequence during the speleogenetic evolution of<br />

the soluble ones is quite common in confined settings<br />

(Klimchouk, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996b, 2000a; Lowe,<br />

1992). This is because changes in permeability of soluble<br />

units through time are much more dynamic and drastic<br />

than changes in non-soluble beds. However, it is important<br />

to recognize that hydraulic properties of karst aquifers<br />

evolved in response to hypogenic transverse speleogenesis,<br />

and are characteristically different from epigenic karst<br />

aquifers, the aspects further discussed in the next three<br />

sections.<br />

Figure 6. Conversion of the hydrogeological function of a soluble<br />

bed in a multiple-aquifer system in the course of speleogenesis<br />

(from Klimchouk, 1996b).<br />

3.3 The concept of transverse speleogenesis<br />

In unconfined settings, early conduit development<br />

occurs by lateral flow through an aquifer, from the input<br />

boundary to the output boundary. Furthermore, it was<br />

commonly implied that water flows along the long<br />

dimension of fractures, which are commonly arranged<br />

laterally relative to bedding (Figure 7), or along pathways<br />

that combine long dimensions of several laterally<br />

connected fissures. Long flow lengths and therefore low<br />

discharge/length ratios (sensu Palmer, 1991) are inferred in<br />

such a configuration, which is commonly used in modeling<br />

of early conduit development. Similarly, the parameter of<br />

passage length, or cave development, derived from<br />

speleological mapping, tacitly implies the meaning of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!