03.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

NCKRI Special Paper No. 1<br />

Figure 16. Examples of polygonal (above: Yellow Jacket Cave in<br />

the Yates Formation) and systematic (below: fragment of<br />

Lechuguilla Cave survey) network patterns in the same region,<br />

Guadalupe Mountains, USA. Yellow Jacket: simplified map from<br />

the original survey drawn by D.Belski, courtesy of the Pecos Valley<br />

Grotto. Lechuguilla: fragment from the original survey drawn by<br />

P.Bosted, courtesy of the US National Park Service.<br />

Irregular chambers can be isolated cavities, or parts of<br />

composite patterns. In hypogenic settings they form in two<br />

situations: 1) by buoyant dissolution at the bottom of the<br />

cave formation, commonly evaporites, where a major<br />

aquifer immediately underlies it; 2) where the recharge<br />

from below is localized and flow and transverse<br />

speleogenesis in the cave formation is guided by prominent<br />

fractures. In the latter case, chamber development is<br />

commonly induced by intersection of the vertical flow path<br />

with a lateral flow-conducting horizon (stratiform<br />

permeability system) that enhances dissolution through<br />

mixing mechanisms. Irregular chambers in hypogenic karst<br />

can attain very large dimensions, such as directly<br />

documented cavities in evaporites of southern Harz,<br />

Germany (cavities of the “schlotten” type; Kempe, 1996),<br />

the Big Room in Carlsbad Cavern, or the indirectly<br />

documented (via drilling) hydrothermal cavity in the<br />

Archean and Proterozoic marbles in southern Bulgaria<br />

with a maximum vertical dimension of 1340 m and an<br />

estimated volume of 237.6 million m 3 (Sebev, 1970;<br />

Dubljansky,V. 2000), probably the largest known,<br />

although not accessible, cave chamber on Earth. It is likely<br />

that hypogenic megasinkholes associated with<br />

hydrothermal systems, such as Sistema El Zacatón in<br />

Mexico (Gary and Sharp, 2006; see Plate 19 and Section<br />

4.5) or obruks (local name in Turkey for cenote-like<br />

sinkholes) in the Konya Basin, Turkey (Plate 19) are<br />

collapse features over giant chambers. However, it is also<br />

possible that they are rising dissolution shafts.<br />

Isolated passages or crude clusters of passages also<br />

form in two situations: 1) in a manner similar to chambers,<br />

by buoyant dissolution at the bottom of the cave formation,<br />

where there is some initial linear guidance (by fractures or<br />

other kinds of weaknesses) but little or no forced flow<br />

across the formation; 2) by forced or mixed flow across a<br />

thin bed, where fracturing is scarce. In the former case<br />

some big irregular passage-like cavities may form, often<br />

associated with chambers, exemplified again by some<br />

“schlottens” in the South Harz (Kempe, 1996). In the latter<br />

case isolated slot-like passages or crude clusters of<br />

passages form, such as those intercepted by mines in the<br />

Neogene limestones in the southern Ukraine (see Figure<br />

31).<br />

Rising shafts are outlets of deep hypogenic systems<br />

and commonly hydrothermal. A type example is the 392 m<br />

deep Pozzo del Merro near Rome, Italy, presumably<br />

formed by rising thermal water charged with CO2 and H2S.<br />

It shows the morphology of a rising shaft (Figure 27), in<br />

contrast with the roughly cylindrical morphology of the<br />

sinkholes of Sistema El Zacatón in Mexico (see below),<br />

where hydrothermal cavities at depth are thought to open<br />

to the surface through collapse.<br />

Consideration of hypogenic cave patterns only in plan<br />

view can be misleading, giving a false impression of<br />

seemingly two-dimensional structures in the case of<br />

laterally extensive network or spongework mazes. Further<br />

confusion arises from the fact that in many relict<br />

hypogenic mazes sediment fill obscures the “root”<br />

morphology at the passage floors, and that minor bottom<br />

features are rarely documented while surveying large maze<br />

caves even when they are recognizable. First recognized in<br />

the Western Ukrainian gypsum mazes and subsequently<br />

found in many maze caves around the world, both in<br />

limestone and gypsum, are numerous feeding conduits at<br />

lower levels, scattered throughout maze patterns at the<br />

master story (Figure 20; see Sections 4.2 and 4.4). With<br />

these feeders and their lower conduits, even largely<br />

horizontal laterally extensive maze patterns become<br />

complex three-dimensional structures.<br />

Complex 3-D cave structures may develop within a<br />

rather thin formation (e.g. two- to four-story mazes in the<br />

western Ukraine confined within the 16-20 m thick gypsum<br />

formation) or extend through a vertical range of several<br />

hundred meters (e.g. Monte Cucco system, Central Italy:<br />

930 m; Lechuguilla Cave in the Guadalupe Mountains,<br />

New Mexico, USA: 490 m). These complex 3-D structures<br />

often display a staircase arrangement of stories within a<br />

system, with cave areas at different stories shifted relative<br />

to each other (as discussed in section 3.5; see Figures 12<br />

and 13), or have feeders at the lower level randomly or<br />

systematically distributed throughout the single master<br />

passage network. Some vertically extensive caves in the<br />

Guadalupe Mountains have prominent feeders as large

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!