03.08.2013 Views

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

Download PDF - Speleogenesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26<br />

NCKRI Special Paper No. 1<br />

significant when initial fractures are substantially enlarged.<br />

However, some recent studies demonstrate the pronounced<br />

role of buoyancy in rather small aperture fractures (Dijk<br />

and Berkowitz, 2000, 2002). In any case, it becomes more<br />

obvious now that buoyancy dissolution is of tremendous<br />

importance in hypogenic speleogenesis, which is strongly<br />

suggested by both regional karst and cave morphogenetic<br />

analyses (see next section and Section 4.3).<br />

3.8 The role of free convection<br />

Free convection (buoyancy) develops due to density<br />

variations in groundwater caused by solute concentration<br />

or temperature gradients, both being commonly<br />

pronounced in confined flow systems. Dissolution always<br />

tends to build up the solute concentration gradient that can<br />

drive buoyancy, hence free convection effects can be<br />

assumed to be inherently involved in speleogenesis,<br />

although they are overridden by forced convection in most<br />

unconfined systems. As forced-flow regimes in confined<br />

settings are commonly sluggish, the buoyancy-generating<br />

potential of dissolution itself gives rise to mixed<br />

convection regimes in most confined karst systems. In<br />

mixed-regime flow systems, speleogenesis commences in<br />

zones of upward cross-formational communication<br />

(Section 3.1), where the vertical hydraulic gradient and<br />

buoyancy potential are co-linear and congruous. The<br />

ascending transverse flow pattern is particularly favorable<br />

for density gradients of both types to develop (solute<br />

concentration and thermal) because less dense fluids enter<br />

a cave-forming zone from below, so that buoyancy effects<br />

play a particularly significant role in confined<br />

speleogenesis (Klimchouk, 1997b, 2000a).<br />

Large-scale (regional) convection cells driven by<br />

density gradients are generally recognized to play a<br />

substantial role in groundwater circulation in sedimentary<br />

basins and adjacent massifs. The resultant flow patterns<br />

favor dissolution through various geochemical<br />

mechanisms. These aspects have been discussed in relation<br />

to many karst regions around the world. The effects are<br />

particularly pronounced in high-gradient zones of<br />

hydrothermal systems and where fresh groundwater comes<br />

in contact with evaporites from below.<br />

Anderson and Kirkland (1980) provided a compelling<br />

demonstration that dissolution due to free convection is the<br />

main mechanism of ascending transverse speleogenesis in<br />

the thick sulfate and salt succession of the Castile and<br />

Salado formations in the Delaware Basin (western Texas<br />

and southeastern New Mexico, USA), resulting in the<br />

development of cavities at depth and cross-formational<br />

collapse breccia (breccia “pipes”) and masses of<br />

bioepigenetic calcite (“castiles” or “buttes”). Relatively<br />

fresh water is supplied through the underlying shelf and<br />

basin aquifers of the Delaware Mountain Group.<br />

Dissolutional chambers develop upward from the base of<br />

the Castile evaporites, with subsequent collapsing and<br />

formation of breccia. In other cases, the evolving<br />

transverse high permeability paths gave rise to replacement<br />

of sulfates by bioepigenetic calcite and the formation of<br />

“buttes” (Kirkland and Evans, 1980). The free convection<br />

flow pattern establishes itself in such zones, with rising<br />

fresh water and sinking dense brine components. The<br />

descending brine ultimately flows out through the basal<br />

aquifer to points of natural discharge.<br />

A similar mechanism was shown to form vast<br />

chambers (Schlotten) in the upper Permian gypsum in the<br />

Sangerhausen and Mansfeld districts of Germany (Kempe,<br />

1996). Schlotten are large voids, commonly isometric,<br />

elongated along the major tectonic fissures. About 100<br />

cavities of this type are known in the region, encountered<br />

through the centuries in the course of mining operations at<br />

depths up to 400 m at the base of the Zechstein gypsum.<br />

Small cavities of this type, rising from the top of the<br />

underlying bed and remaining seemingly isolated from any<br />

integrated cave system, are commonly observed in gypsum<br />

quarries in the western Ukraine.<br />

<strong>Speleogenesis</strong> at the base of deep-seated evaporites,<br />

driven by free convection from an underlying aquifer, is<br />

responsible for initiation of vertical breakdown structures<br />

called “breccia pipes,” “breccia chimneys,” “collapse<br />

columns,” “geologic organ pipes,” or “vertical through<br />

structures,” which are abundant in many deep-seated<br />

evaporite karsts as illustrated by many studies from the<br />

United States, Canada, China, Germany and Russia. They<br />

have diameters ranging from tens to over 100 m and<br />

propagate by upward dissolution and stoping from depths<br />

as great as 1200 m (Klimchouk and Andrejchuk, 1996).<br />

Anderson and Kirkland (1980) generalized that “If the<br />

source of the dissolving water is artesian or otherwise<br />

continuous, a flow cycle is developed in which the salt<br />

itself supplies the density gradient that becomes the vehicle<br />

of its own dissolution” (1980, p.66). It can be further<br />

generalized that in confined settings the buoyancy<br />

“vehicle” operates in all major karst lithologies and at<br />

various scales, powered by solute concentration, thermal<br />

gradients, or both.<br />

Curl (1966) provided a theoretical analysis of conduit<br />

enlargement by natural convection in a limestone aquifer,<br />

depicting transitional conditions that determine the<br />

prevalence of natural convection or forced flow regimes.<br />

He found that, with sufficiently slow water circulation<br />

(common in confined settings) convection caused by<br />

density differences might be the primary flow mode for<br />

limestone removal. This is made possible by even<br />

extremely small compositional differences. It is apparent<br />

that the effect becomes much stronger where evaporites are<br />

underlain by aquifers containing relatively fresh waters,<br />

and where thermal gradients are involved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!