Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Download PDF - Speleogenesis
Download PDF - Speleogenesis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HYPOGENIC CAVE FEATURES<br />
4.5 Selected examples of caves formed by<br />
hypogenic transverse speleogenesis<br />
In this section, a brief overview is provided of some<br />
exemplary caves for which hypogene transverse origin is<br />
firmly established or suspected based on available<br />
publications and personal observations by the author. Not<br />
all of them have been previously interpreted in this way,<br />
but their morphological and geological characteristics,<br />
consistent with the criteria discussed above, strongly<br />
suggest their development by rising flow in confined<br />
settings.<br />
In no way should this overview be considered as<br />
exhaustive for hypogenic caves. The number of such caves<br />
recognized around the world is rapidly growing, and it is<br />
going to expand dramatically by re-interpretation of many<br />
caves, based on the new approach suggested in this book.<br />
Rather, this is a list of reference cases to use in relating,<br />
refining or revising the origin of a great number of caves in<br />
many regions, and an illustration of the variety of<br />
geographic and geologic settings in which ascending<br />
hypogenic speleogenesis occurs.<br />
Central and Western Europe<br />
Hypogenic transverse caves are abundant throughout<br />
Central and Western Europe, occurring in both cratonic<br />
and disrupted (folded) settings.<br />
Probably the most well known and early recognized as<br />
hypogenic (hydrothermal) are caves in the Buda<br />
Mountains, Hungary (e.g. Müller and Sarvary, 1977. There<br />
is abundant literature on Hungarian hydrothermal caves,<br />
summarized in Takács-Bolner and Kraus (1989) and<br />
Dublyansky, Yu. (1995, 2000c). Triassic cherty limestones<br />
are overlain by 40-60 m of Eocene limestones covered by<br />
marls that form a largely impermeable cap. Denudation<br />
and fluvial erosion imposed over the complex block-fault<br />
geologic structure created various situations of breaching<br />
and draining of the cave-hosting limestones. Mean<br />
temperatures of descending waters invading the caves are<br />
8-13 o C. Different thermal springs have mean temperatures<br />
between 20-60 o C, indicating that differing amounts of<br />
mixing take place (Ford and Williams, 2007). Almost the<br />
full range of thermal cave types and evolutionary stages of<br />
development can be found in Budapest, including 2-D and<br />
3-D mazes, relict shafts, chambers, and modern caves<br />
discharging rising thermal waters at the level of the<br />
Danube River.<br />
Ford and Williams (2007) refer to a series of<br />
illustrative examples of the Buda Mountains caves.<br />
Pálvölgyi (Figure 22, A) and Ferenc-hegy caves are multistory<br />
mazes. Szemlöhegy Cave is a more simple outlet rift<br />
from along joints; it has abundant subaqueous calcite<br />
crusts. Molnár János is a modern outlet; its warm waters<br />
have been dove to -70 m, discovering ~4 km of maze at<br />
depth. Jószefhegy Cave is a shaft descending to ramiform<br />
chambers with abundant secondary gypsum deposits,<br />
where Ford and Williams (2007) point out that CO2<br />
(hydrothermal) and H2S dissolution mechanisms may<br />
mingle within a small geographical area.<br />
Sátorkö-puszta Cave and Bátori Cave (Figure 22, B)<br />
are examples of basal chambers with a tree-like branching<br />
pattern of rising passages containing sequences of<br />
spherical cupolas. These passages extend for about 40 m<br />
above the chamber in Sátorkö-puszta. The origin of<br />
cupolas had been attributed earlier to the convectional<br />
condensation mechanism operating above the water table<br />
(Szunyogh, 1989). The chamber walls are largely<br />
converted to gypsum. Ford and Williams (2007) believe<br />
these caves are monogenetic H2S systems, major<br />
enlargements by H2S processes of earlier rising water<br />
shafts.<br />
Figure 22. Patterns of hydrothermal caves of the Buda Mountains, Hungary. A = maze pattern, plan view of Pálvölgyi Cave (by J. Kárpát<br />
and K. Takácsne-Bolner); B = bush-like patterns, 1 = profile of Sátorkö-puszta Cave (by M. Juhasz), 2 = profile of Bátori Cave (by P. Borka<br />
and J. Kárpát). From Dublyansky Yu. (2000c).<br />
57