06.08.2013 Views

GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...

GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...

GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>GM</strong> <strong>Crops</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>First</strong> <strong>Ten</strong> <strong>Years</strong><br />

c) Building on this <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> technology to lower real soybean prices, some<br />

(limited) economic analysis has been undertaken to estimate <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>GM</strong> technology<br />

on global prices of soybeans. Moschini et al (2000) estimated that by 2000 <strong>the</strong> influence of<br />

<strong>GM</strong> soybean technology on world prices of soybeans had been between -0.5% and -1%,<br />

and that as adoption levels increased this could increase up to -6% (if all global production<br />

was <strong>GM</strong>). Quam & Traxler (2002) estimated <strong>the</strong> impact of RR soybean technology adoption<br />

on global soybean prices to have been -1.9% by 2001.<br />

4 <strong>The</strong> environmental impact of <strong>GM</strong> crops<br />

This section examines <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of using <strong>GM</strong> crops over <strong>the</strong> last ten years. <strong>The</strong><br />

two key aspects of environmental impact explored are:<br />

a) Impact on insecticide and herbicide use.<br />

b) Impact on carbon emissions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are presented in <strong>the</strong> sub-sections below.<br />

4.1 Use of insecticides and herbicides<br />

<strong>The</strong> most common way in which changes in pesticide use on <strong>GM</strong> crops has been presented is in<br />

terms of <strong>the</strong> volumes (quantities) of pesticides applied. Whilst comparisons of total volumes of<br />

pesticide use in a crop production system can be a useful indicator of environmental impacts, it is<br />

an imperfect measure because:<br />

• different active ingredients and amounts may be applied in <strong>GM</strong> or conventional systems;<br />

• <strong>the</strong> environmental behaviour and toxicity profile of individual pesticides varies.<br />

To provide a more robust measurement of <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of <strong>GM</strong> crops, <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />

presented in <strong>the</strong> sub-sections below includes both an assessment of pesticide active ingredient<br />

use, as well as <strong>the</strong> assessment of <strong>the</strong> specific pesticides used via an indicator known as <strong>the</strong><br />

Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ). This universal indicator, developed by Kovach et al (1992 &<br />

updated annually), effectively integrates <strong>the</strong> various environmental impacts of individual pesticides<br />

into a single 'field value per hectare'. This provides a more balanced assessment of <strong>the</strong> impact of<br />

<strong>GM</strong> crops on <strong>the</strong> environment as it draws on all of <strong>the</strong> key toxicity and environmental exposure<br />

data related to individual products (as applicable to impacts on farm workers, consumers and<br />

ecology) and hence provides not only a consistent but a fairly comprehensive measure of<br />

environmental impact. Readers should however note that <strong>the</strong> EIQ is an indicator only and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<br />

does not take into account all environmental issues/impacts.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!