GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...
GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...
GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>GM</strong> <strong>Crops</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>First</strong> <strong>Ten</strong> <strong>Years</strong><br />
c) Building on this <strong>the</strong>me of <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> technology to lower real soybean prices, some<br />
(limited) economic analysis has been undertaken to estimate <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>GM</strong> technology<br />
on global prices of soybeans. Moschini et al (2000) estimated that by 2000 <strong>the</strong> influence of<br />
<strong>GM</strong> soybean technology on world prices of soybeans had been between -0.5% and -1%,<br />
and that as adoption levels increased this could increase up to -6% (if all global production<br />
was <strong>GM</strong>). Quam & Traxler (2002) estimated <strong>the</strong> impact of RR soybean technology adoption<br />
on global soybean prices to have been -1.9% by 2001.<br />
4 <strong>The</strong> environmental impact of <strong>GM</strong> crops<br />
This section examines <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of using <strong>GM</strong> crops over <strong>the</strong> last ten years. <strong>The</strong><br />
two key aspects of environmental impact explored are:<br />
a) Impact on insecticide and herbicide use.<br />
b) Impact on carbon emissions.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are presented in <strong>the</strong> sub-sections below.<br />
4.1 Use of insecticides and herbicides<br />
<strong>The</strong> most common way in which changes in pesticide use on <strong>GM</strong> crops has been presented is in<br />
terms of <strong>the</strong> volumes (quantities) of pesticides applied. Whilst comparisons of total volumes of<br />
pesticide use in a crop production system can be a useful indicator of environmental impacts, it is<br />
an imperfect measure because:<br />
• different active ingredients and amounts may be applied in <strong>GM</strong> or conventional systems;<br />
• <strong>the</strong> environmental behaviour and toxicity profile of individual pesticides varies.<br />
To provide a more robust measurement of <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of <strong>GM</strong> crops, <strong>the</strong> analysis<br />
presented in <strong>the</strong> sub-sections below includes both an assessment of pesticide active ingredient<br />
use, as well as <strong>the</strong> assessment of <strong>the</strong> specific pesticides used via an indicator known as <strong>the</strong><br />
Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ). This universal indicator, developed by Kovach et al (1992 &<br />
updated annually), effectively integrates <strong>the</strong> various environmental impacts of individual pesticides<br />
into a single 'field value per hectare'. This provides a more balanced assessment of <strong>the</strong> impact of<br />
<strong>GM</strong> crops on <strong>the</strong> environment as it draws on all of <strong>the</strong> key toxicity and environmental exposure<br />
data related to individual products (as applicable to impacts on farm workers, consumers and<br />
ecology) and hence provides not only a consistent but a fairly comprehensive measure of<br />
environmental impact. Readers should however note that <strong>the</strong> EIQ is an indicator only and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<br />
does not take into account all environmental issues/impacts.<br />
41