GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

List of Tables Table 1. Global farm income benefits from growing GM crops 1996-2005: million US $.............. Table 2. GM crop farm income benefits 1996-2005 selected countries: million US $ ................. Table 3. GM crop farm income benefits 2005: developing versus developed countries: million US $ Table 4. Cost of accessing GM technology (in % terms) relative to the total farm income benefits 2005 Table 5. Impact of changes in the use of herbicides and insecticides from growing GM crops globally 1996-2005 ...................................................................................................... Table 6. Reduction in environmental impact from changes in pesticide use associated with GM crop adoption by country 1996-2005 selected countries: % reduction in field EIQ values Table 7. GM crop environmental benefits from lower insecticide and herbicide use 1996-2005: developing versus developed countries ........................................................................ Table 8. Context of carbon sequestration impact 2005: car equivalents ...................................... Table 9. Global GM plantings by country 1996-2005 ('000 hectares) .......................................... Table 10. GM technology share of crop plantings in 2005 by country (% of total plantings) .......... Table 11. Farm level income impact of using GM HT soybeans in the US 1996-2005 .................. Table 12. Farm level income impact of using GM HT soybeans in Argentina 1996-2005 ............. Table 13. Farm level income impact of using GM HT soybeans in Brazil 1997-2005 ................... Table 14. Farm level income impact of using GM HT soybeans in Canada 1997-2005 .................. Table 15. Farm level income impact of using GM HT soybeans in South Africa 2001-2005 .......... Table 16. Farm level income impact of using herbicide tolerant soybeans in Romania 1999-2005.... Table 17. Farm level income impact of using GM HT canola in Canada 1996-2005 ..................... Table 18. Farm level income impact of using GM IR maize in the US 1996-2005 ........................ Table 19. Farm level income impact of using GM IR maize in South Africa 2001-2005 ................ Table 20. Farm level income impact of using GM IR maize in Spain 1998-2005.......................... Table 21. Farm level income impact of using GM IR cotton in the US 1996-2005 ......................... Table 22. Farm level income impact of using GM IR cotton in China 1997-2005 .......................... Table 23. Farm level income impact of using GM IR cotton in Australia 1996-2004 ...................... Table 24. Farm level income impact of using GM IR cotton in Mexico 1996-2005 ....................... Table 25. Farm level income impact of using GM IR cotton in India 2002-2005 .......................... Table 26. Share of global crop trade accounted for GM production 2005 (million tonnes) ............ Table 27. Share of global crop derivative (meal) trade accounted for GM production 2005 (million tonnes) Table 28. Herbicide usage on soybeans in the US 1996-2005 ...................................................... Table 29. Herbicide usage on GM HT and conventional soybeans in the US 1996-2005 ................ Table 30. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT soybeans in the US 1996-2005........................................................................................................ Table 31. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT soybeans in Canada 1996-2005 ....................................................................................................... Table 32. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT soybeans in Brazil 1997-2005 .......................................................................................................... Table 33. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT soybeans in Romania 1999-2005 ....................................................................................................... Table 34. Herbicide usage on maize in the US 1996-2004 ........................................................... Table 35. Average US maize herbicide usage and environmental load 1997-2004: conventional and GM HT ................................................................................................................... Table 36. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT maize in the US 1997-2004 .............................................................................................................. viii ix ix x xii xiii xiii xv 6 6 8 10 11 13 13 15 21 23 25 25 27 28 29 31 33 38 83 43 43 44 45 46 48 50 50 51 iii
List of Tables Table 37. Change in herbicide use and environmental load from using GM HT maize in Canada 1999-2005 ................................................................................................................... Table 38. Herbicide usage on cotton in the US 1996-2005 ........................................................... Table 39. Herbicide usage and its associated environmental load: GM HT and conventional cotton in the US 1997-2004 ................................................................................................... Table 40. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT cotton in the US 1997-2005 ............................................................................................................. Table 41. National level changes in herbicide ai use and field EIQ values for GM HT cotton in Australia 2000-2005 (negative sign denotes increase in use) .......................................... Table 42. Average US maize insecticide usage and its environmental load 1996-2005: conventional versus GM ..................................................................................................................... Table 43. National level changes in insecticide ai use and field EIQ values for GM IR maize in the US 1996-2005 ............................................................................................................. Table 44. Average US cotton insecticide usage and environmental impact 1996-2005: conventional versus GM .................................................................................................................... Table 45. National level changes in insecticide ai use and field EIQ values for GM IR cotton in the US 1996-2005 ............................................................................................................. Table 46. National level changes in insecticide ai use and field EIQ values for GM IR cotton in China 1997-2005 ......................................................................................................... Table 47. Comparison of insecticide ai use and field EIQ values for conventional, Ingard and Bollgard II cotton in Australia ............................................................................................ Table 48. National level changes in insecticide ai use and field EIQ values for GM IR cotton in Australia 1996-2005 ..................................................................................................... Table 49. National level changes in insecticide ai use and field EIQ values for GM IR cotton in Argentina 1998-2005 ................................................................................................... Table 50. Tractor fuel consumption by tillage method ................................................................... Table 51. Summary of the potential; of NT cultivation systems ...................................................... Table 52. US soybean tillage practices and the adoption of GM HT cultivars 1996-2005 (million ha) Table 53. US soybean consumption of tractor fuel used for tillage 1996-2005 .............................. Table 54. US soybeans: permanent reduction in tractor fuel consumption and reduction in CO 2 emissions Table 55. US soybeans: potential soil carbon sequestration (1996 to 2005) .................................. Table 56. US soybeans: potential additional soil carbon sequestration (1996 to 2005) .................. Table 57. Argentina soybean tillage practices and the adoption of GM cultivars 1996-2005 (million ha) Table 58. Argentine soybeans: permanent reduction in tractor fuel consumption and reduction in CO 2 emissions ................................................................................................................ Table 59. Argentine soybeans: potential additional soil carbon sequestration (1996 to 2005) ......... Table 60. Canadian canola: permanent reduction in tractor fuel consumption and reduction in CO 2 emissions ................................................................................................................ Table 61. Canada canola: potential additional soil carbon sequestration (1996 to 2005) ................ Table 62. Permanent reduction in global tractor fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions resulting from the cultivation of GM insect resistant cotton ......................................................... Table 63. Summary of carbon sequestration impact 1996-2005 ................................................... Table 64. Context of carbon sequestration impact 2005: car equivalents ...................................... iv 52 53 54 55 56 59 59 63 63 64 65 65 66 68 70 73 74 74 75 76 76 77 78 79 80 81 83 83
Page 1 and 2: I S A A A INTERNATIONAL SERVICE FOR
Page 3 and 4: Published by: Copyright: Citation:
Page 5: Contents 3.6.2 China ..............
Page 10 and 11: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS E
Page 12 and 13: Table 2. GM crop farm income benefi
Page 14 and 15: Executive Summary and Conclusions
Page 16 and 17: Executive Summary and Conclusions T
Page 18 and 19: Table 8. Context of carbon sequestr
Page 20 and 21: 1 INTRODUCTION GM Crops: The First
Page 22 and 23: GM Crops: The First Ten Years Figur
Page 24 and 25: Figure 4. Global GM crop plantings
Page 26 and 27: 3 THE FARM LEVEL ECONOMIC IMPACT OF
Page 28 and 29: • The annual total national farm
Page 30 and 31: 3.1.3 Brazil GM HT soybeans were pr
Page 32 and 33: Table 14. Farm level income impact
Page 34 and 35: GM Crops: The First Ten Years Table
Page 36 and 37: 3.2.2 Canada GM Crops: The First Te
Page 38 and 39: 3.3.2 Other countries GM Crops: The
Page 54 and 55: 3.7.4 Insect resistant potatoes GM
Page 56 and 57:
size. The analysis found that mean
Page 58 and 59:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years soybe
Page 60 and 61:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years c) Bu
Page 62 and 63:
Table 28. Herbicide usage on soybea
Page 64 and 65:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years a sma
Page 66 and 67:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years Makin
Page 68 and 69:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years Figur
Page 70 and 71:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years aceto
Page 72 and 73:
Table 38. Herbicide usage on cotton
Page 74 and 75:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years At th
Page 76 and 77:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years Figur
Page 78 and 79:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years Table
Page 80 and 81:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years been
Page 82 and 83:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years Table
Page 84 and 85:
Table 47. Comparison of insecticide
Page 86 and 87:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years g) Su
Page 88 and 89:
In terms of GHG each litre of tract
Page 90 and 91:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years As we
Page 92 and 93:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years using
Page 94 and 95:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years b) So
Page 96 and 97:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years a) Fu
Page 98 and 99:
GM Crops: The First Ten Years b) So
Page 100 and 101:
4.2.7 Insect resistant cotton The c
Page 102 and 103:
Table 63. Summary of carbon sequest
Page 104 and 105:
Appendix Appendix 2: The Environmen
Page 106 and 107:
Appendix environmental factor is eq
Page 108 and 109:
Appendix 3: Additional information
Page 110 and 111:
Typical herbicide regimes for GM HT
Page 112 and 113:
Typical insecticide regimes for cot
Page 114 and 115:
References Fernandez-Cornejo J & Mc
Page 116:
ISBN 1-892456-41-9
show all

GM Crops: The First Ten Years - International Service for the ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?