10.08.2013 Views

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.] Imam Salim Mu‟min –Response to <strong>Muhammad</strong> Abdur-Rahman<br />

If there was a possibility <strong>of</strong> seeing then the particle laa would be used [in Sura 7:143]. The<br />

particle Lan is used to deny from the time speaking into the future. Meaning you do not see me now and<br />

you will not see me in the future. In other words you wil never see me. If i say laa tarnee then you are<br />

saying that you do not see me as we are speaking, but there is a possibility <strong>of</strong> you seeing me in the future.<br />

It makes it just as impossible when spoken as it does now because we are in the future <strong>of</strong> the spoken word.<br />

It was not possible then and it is not possible now. Then we must come to the conclusion that Allah can't<br />

be seen physically, mentally, or spiriutally. Only that we come to the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Allah by inference <strong>of</strong><br />

His creation, i.e. the mountain. That is the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Abraham in his search for Allah, and others.<br />

They studied the creation and in doing so that did not become subject to the creation like our universities<br />

have, but they realised that there has to be a creator behind all <strong>of</strong> this. That is why you can't read the<br />

Qur'an and come away saying this is Allah or that is Allah. If you can read the Qur'an and the second<br />

reading becomes open to you, you will agree with the Qur'an that only Allah has the ta'weel. Ta'weel<br />

comes from the word meaning first. Allah is the first authority on the writing <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an and the<br />

Creation. And man has not reached the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the transcending message <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an. Therefore<br />

those who are well grounded in knowledge will declare that it is from Allah. No man wrote this, and no<br />

man created this, and Allah does not have to reveal himself in the person <strong>of</strong> a man to prove His existance.<br />

It is on the pagans who see scripture in its physical form and take it as the reality that need a man shown<br />

to them as Allah. This is not new for man on earth. And to make him a Black or White G-d is only a<br />

mythological scheme to help elevate a people out <strong>of</strong> the dark condition that they are in. The light is on,<br />

we are no longer in "Black Bottom <strong>of</strong> the Motor City." Meaning we are not ignorant people that are only<br />

moved by motor reflex.<br />

6.] Imam Salim Mu‟min – Respnse to <strong>Dr</strong> <strong>Wesley</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> Response Part II<br />

Allah is not tauheed. Tauheed suggests the coming together <strong>of</strong> many parts to become one. It is in<br />

the second form. Allah is not the coming together <strong>of</strong> many parts. The tauheed is in the creation and Allah<br />

is not creation. The creation, though it appears diverse it has its unity, that is it comes together as one<br />

within its many parts. I do not have to elaborate if you know Arabic. All <strong>of</strong> the verses <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an has its<br />

explicit meaning and its implied meaning. We have the two readings. The second reading becomes<br />

transcending, that is the ta'weel is only known by Allah. Many minds have not been unlocked for the<br />

second reading, especially the anthropormophist and those <strong>of</strong> empirical thinking. You need Allah's help to<br />

open for you the second readings. Most <strong>of</strong> the world including the Muslim world have an<br />

anthorpormorphic conception. That is why they came up with titles such as Khalifa, Mahdi, and others to<br />

say that a man is bigger than all other men that he must have a divine presence, and go as far as to say he<br />

is G-d himself. We dont need to go to the anals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Is</strong>lamic writings to find this kind <strong>of</strong> thinking, go to any<br />

Egypt, major city and you will find the pagans. You can have your reading on the first level but it is the<br />

second reading that is much better. Most <strong>of</strong> the followers <strong>of</strong> Imam W. Deen Mohammed and Minister<br />

Farrakhan are too sensitive to debate whether Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> is G-d or not. That's why <strong>Dr</strong>. Westley<br />

has to deflect. He is not ready to scrutinize the teachings <strong>of</strong> Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> and the Honorable Elijah<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong> in comparison to the Qur'an. I am ready to take verse by verse <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an from the<br />

Arabic text and compare it to the teachings <strong>of</strong> Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> to prove that Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> did not<br />

write the Qur'an and He is not the G-d <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an. Let's start with Al-Fatihah. The Qur'an is the best<br />

argument for us or against us. So let me know when you are ready to start. Otherwise I will continue to<br />

watch and appreciate your research.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!