Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad
Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad
Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.] Imam Salim Mu‟min –Response to <strong>Muhammad</strong> Abdur-Rahman<br />
If there was a possibility <strong>of</strong> seeing then the particle laa would be used [in Sura 7:143]. The<br />
particle Lan is used to deny from the time speaking into the future. Meaning you do not see me now and<br />
you will not see me in the future. In other words you wil never see me. If i say laa tarnee then you are<br />
saying that you do not see me as we are speaking, but there is a possibility <strong>of</strong> you seeing me in the future.<br />
It makes it just as impossible when spoken as it does now because we are in the future <strong>of</strong> the spoken word.<br />
It was not possible then and it is not possible now. Then we must come to the conclusion that Allah can't<br />
be seen physically, mentally, or spiriutally. Only that we come to the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Allah by inference <strong>of</strong><br />
His creation, i.e. the mountain. That is the conclusion <strong>of</strong> Abraham in his search for Allah, and others.<br />
They studied the creation and in doing so that did not become subject to the creation like our universities<br />
have, but they realised that there has to be a creator behind all <strong>of</strong> this. That is why you can't read the<br />
Qur'an and come away saying this is Allah or that is Allah. If you can read the Qur'an and the second<br />
reading becomes open to you, you will agree with the Qur'an that only Allah has the ta'weel. Ta'weel<br />
comes from the word meaning first. Allah is the first authority on the writing <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an and the<br />
Creation. And man has not reached the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the transcending message <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an. Therefore<br />
those who are well grounded in knowledge will declare that it is from Allah. No man wrote this, and no<br />
man created this, and Allah does not have to reveal himself in the person <strong>of</strong> a man to prove His existance.<br />
It is on the pagans who see scripture in its physical form and take it as the reality that need a man shown<br />
to them as Allah. This is not new for man on earth. And to make him a Black or White G-d is only a<br />
mythological scheme to help elevate a people out <strong>of</strong> the dark condition that they are in. The light is on,<br />
we are no longer in "Black Bottom <strong>of</strong> the Motor City." Meaning we are not ignorant people that are only<br />
moved by motor reflex.<br />
6.] Imam Salim Mu‟min – Respnse to <strong>Dr</strong> <strong>Wesley</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong> Response Part II<br />
Allah is not tauheed. Tauheed suggests the coming together <strong>of</strong> many parts to become one. It is in<br />
the second form. Allah is not the coming together <strong>of</strong> many parts. The tauheed is in the creation and Allah<br />
is not creation. The creation, though it appears diverse it has its unity, that is it comes together as one<br />
within its many parts. I do not have to elaborate if you know Arabic. All <strong>of</strong> the verses <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an has its<br />
explicit meaning and its implied meaning. We have the two readings. The second reading becomes<br />
transcending, that is the ta'weel is only known by Allah. Many minds have not been unlocked for the<br />
second reading, especially the anthropormophist and those <strong>of</strong> empirical thinking. You need Allah's help to<br />
open for you the second readings. Most <strong>of</strong> the world including the Muslim world have an<br />
anthorpormorphic conception. That is why they came up with titles such as Khalifa, Mahdi, and others to<br />
say that a man is bigger than all other men that he must have a divine presence, and go as far as to say he<br />
is G-d himself. We dont need to go to the anals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Is</strong>lamic writings to find this kind <strong>of</strong> thinking, go to any<br />
Egypt, major city and you will find the pagans. You can have your reading on the first level but it is the<br />
second reading that is much better. Most <strong>of</strong> the followers <strong>of</strong> Imam W. Deen Mohammed and Minister<br />
Farrakhan are too sensitive to debate whether Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> is G-d or not. That's why <strong>Dr</strong>. Westley<br />
has to deflect. He is not ready to scrutinize the teachings <strong>of</strong> Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> and the Honorable Elijah<br />
<strong>Muhammad</strong> in comparison to the Qur'an. I am ready to take verse by verse <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an from the<br />
Arabic text and compare it to the teachings <strong>of</strong> Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> to prove that Fard <strong>Muhammad</strong> did not<br />
write the Qur'an and He is not the G-d <strong>of</strong> the Qur'an. Let's start with Al-Fatihah. The Qur'an is the best<br />
argument for us or against us. So let me know when you are ready to start. Otherwise I will continue to<br />
watch and appreciate your research.<br />
30