10.08.2013 Views

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

Is THEM Guilty of Shirk? - Dr. Wesley Muhammad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A number <strong>of</strong> comments are warranted here. First, it was not my ―contention that the prophet predicted<br />

(in this hadith) a white takeover and corruption <strong>of</strong> Al-<strong>Is</strong>lam.‖ The white takeover – yes. The white<br />

corruption – no. While historically the white ‗corruption‘ did indeed follow the ‗white takeover‘, I was<br />

careful to only claim for this hadith that the Prophet pointed out ―the Black Arab/White convert<br />

dichotomy.‖ Secondly, the Black Sheep/White Sheep metaphor is undoubtedly a racial reference, Bro<br />

Imam Salim‘s purely speculative theological interpretation notwithstanding. Now, I don‘t deny Imam<br />

Salim or yourself the right to interpret this hadith how you will, nor do I suggest that your interpretations<br />

must be wrong and mine must be right. Nor is Bro Mubaashir‘s suggestion <strong>of</strong> the relevance <strong>of</strong> the 7 th<br />

century agrarian context <strong>of</strong> the metaphor denied here. I am, however, suggesting that the difference in<br />

our methods <strong>of</strong> interpretation is also germane here. While Imam Salim chooses to interpret this<br />

‗black/white sheep‘ metaphor in accord with certain theological/symbolist presuppositions that he holds,<br />

I choose to interpret it in the light <strong>of</strong> the known history <strong>of</strong> the Umma, and therefore suggest that Prophet<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong> was being, well…prophetic.<br />

It is an historical fact that the original Umma was mainly Arab, and that these Arabs were black. It is also<br />

the case that whites, particularly Persians, Byzantines, and Turks, entered the religion in large numbers<br />

beginning in the 8 th-9 th century, and these whites, after ‗converting‘ to Arabism (i.e. adopting the<br />

language, dress, and religion <strong>of</strong> the black Arabs), indeed ‗squeezed out‘ the original black Arabs and<br />

became the main shapers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Is</strong>lamic intellectual, theological and political tradition. I document these facts<br />

in my books, ‗Black Arabia and the African Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>Is</strong>lam‘ and ‗God‘s Black Prophets: Deconstructing<br />

the Myth <strong>of</strong> the White <strong>Muhammad</strong> <strong>of</strong> Arabia and Jesus <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem.‘ It is also an historical fact that the<br />

<strong>Is</strong>lam <strong>of</strong> the black Arabs was very different from the <strong>Is</strong>lam <strong>of</strong> the ‗new Arabs‘, the white converts to <strong>Is</strong>lam<br />

and Arabism. Lastly, it is also an historical fact that the incorporeal and invisible god <strong>of</strong> Bro Mubaashir<br />

and the rest <strong>of</strong> the modern Muslim world was introduced into <strong>Is</strong>lam NOT by the Holy Prophet<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong> or the Black Arabs <strong>of</strong> the original Umma, but by white, specifically Persian converts to the<br />

religion. I document this in my book, ―Take Another Look‖.<br />

That the ‗black sheep‘ metaphor used <strong>of</strong> the original Arab Ummah is a reference to the blackness <strong>of</strong> these<br />

original Arabs is confirmed by numerous reports. A good indicator <strong>of</strong> this is the example <strong>of</strong> <strong>Muhammad</strong><br />

b. Abd Allah (d. 762), known also as al-Nafs al-Zakiyya (―The Pure Soul‖). He was a pure Qurayshi Arab<br />

and pure descendent <strong>of</strong> the Prophet himself through the latter‘s daughter Fatimah, wife <strong>of</strong> Ali b. Abi<br />

Talib. He boasted <strong>of</strong> being ―at the very center <strong>of</strong> the Banu Hashim‘s lines. My paternity is purest among<br />

them, undiluted with non-Arab blood, and no concubines dispute over me.‖ What did this pure Arab<br />

descendent <strong>of</strong> the Prophet look like? Al-Dhahabi describes him as ―black-skinned and huge‖ (Al-„Ibar,<br />

4:198) and al-Tabari (Ta‟rikh 10:203) reports:<br />

―<strong>Muhammad</strong> (Al-Nafs al-Zakiyya) was black, exceedingly black, jet black (adam shadid al-udma<br />

adlam) and huge. He was nicknamed ‗Tar Face‘ (al-qari) because <strong>of</strong> his black complexion<br />

(udmatihi), such that (the Abbasid caliph) Abu Ja‘far used to call him ‗Charcoal Face‘ (almuhammam).‖<br />

<strong>Muhammad</strong> al-Nafs al-Zakiyya, a Qurayshi Arab whose pure lineage on both his father‘s and his<br />

mother‘s side put him ―at the center‖ <strong>of</strong> the genealogical lines <strong>of</strong> the Banu Hashim, the Prophet‘s kinsfolk,<br />

was so black he was called ‗Tar face‘ and ‗Charcoal face‘. He best represents those ‗black sheep‘ to whom<br />

the message <strong>of</strong> <strong>Is</strong>lam first came and who disappeared from view once non-Arab groups converted in large<br />

numbers. Hear also the words <strong>of</strong> the ninth century poet Abu al-Hasan Ali b. al-Abbas b. Jurayj, also<br />

known as Ibn al-Rumi (d. 896). Ibn al-Rumi was not an Arab. His mother was a Persian and his father<br />

was Byzantine (some say half-Greek). Yet, in his poetry he presented himself as an advocate <strong>of</strong> the (now)<br />

ill-treated black Arabs, in particular the black family <strong>of</strong> Prophet <strong>Muhammad</strong>. Ibn al-Rumi was a Shiite<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!