10.08.2013 Views

Hyperbare Zuurstoftherapie: Rapid Assessment - KCE

Hyperbare Zuurstoftherapie: Rapid Assessment - KCE

Hyperbare Zuurstoftherapie: Rapid Assessment - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 74<br />

Figure 37. One-way sensitivity analysis: impact of equipment lifetime on cost<br />

per session (6-place chamber, two sessions per day, and 90% occupancy rate)<br />

cost per session<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

5.9.7 Discussion<br />

0<br />

81 81 80 79 79 79 78<br />

78 77 77 77<br />

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30<br />

equipment lifetime<br />

The largest cost component of the hyperbaric therapy is the personnel cost (48-77%<br />

varying from scenario for multiplace chambers), followed by the investment cost of the<br />

hyperbaric chamber (15-32%). The cost of oxygen and pressurized air is only marginal<br />

(1-6%).<br />

The cost of running a monoplace chamber is significantly higher than that of a multiplace<br />

chamber. If a monoplace chamber is used one session a day with an occupancy rate of<br />

90%, the cost per session is on average €311, compared to the cost of a 6- and 12-place<br />

of €102 and €58, respectively, taking into account the same number of sessions per day<br />

(one session) and occupancy rate (90%). The significantly larger cost for the monoplace<br />

chamber is driven by the higher average personnel cost per patient and the relatively<br />

larger investment cost per patient (in absolute numbers).<br />

Furthermore, and not surprisingly, we observe that a higher occupancy rate and more<br />

sessions per day result in a lower average cost per session. Moreover, we also notice<br />

that in order to control the personnel costs, it is more cost-efficient to work fewer<br />

sessions per day with a higher occupancy rate, than vice versa. For example, in a 12place<br />

chamber, one session per day with a 90% occupancy rate results in an average<br />

cost per session of €58. In contrast, three sessions per day with a 30% occupancy rate,<br />

offering the same amount of patient sessions, results in an average cost of €107.<br />

Currently, HBOT centres offer one or two sessions per day. With two sessions per day<br />

and an occupancy rate of 90%, a monoplace chamber offers 432 treatment sessions per<br />

year. This is nearly 2 600 and 5 200 patient sessions per year for a 6-place and 12-place<br />

chamber, respectively. Currently, there is no shortage of capacity since several centres<br />

have a lower occupancy rate and because more treatment sessions per day could be<br />

offered.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!