13.08.2013 Views

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIRST GENERATION<br />

RICHARD OLMSTED, Norwalk, Conn. bap. at Fairsted, Essex County,<br />

England, Feb. 20, 1612 ; son o£ Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong>, who was son <strong>of</strong> James and Jane<br />

(Bristow) <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>of</strong> Great Leighs, Essex County, England. His will is<br />

dated Sept. 5, 1684. As appears <strong>in</strong> his will, he was married twice, but <strong>the</strong><br />

names <strong>of</strong> his wives are not known. His sons were children <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first wife.<br />

He also had a daughter who had died before <strong>the</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> his will.<br />

3954, James +. 3955, John +.<br />

Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> came with <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong> to <strong>America</strong>, and until his marriage<br />

was probably a member <strong>of</strong> his Uncle James' <strong>family</strong>; but <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> that<br />

event we have no record. He came to Hartford <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1636, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> party from Newtown, Mass. He was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first settlers and proprietors<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new town. In two divisions <strong>of</strong> land, he had <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10 and 8. His house lot was No. 49, and was on <strong>the</strong> west side <strong>of</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong> St.,<br />

on part <strong>of</strong> which now stands <strong>the</strong> Center Church and <strong>the</strong> old bury<strong>in</strong>g ground<br />

(<strong>the</strong> second one <strong>in</strong> Hartford).<br />

The town bought <strong>the</strong> lot, as per record: " The 11 <strong>of</strong> January, 1640. It is<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r ordered that <strong>the</strong> Bury<strong>in</strong>g-place is appo<strong>in</strong>ted to be (a) parcel <strong>of</strong> Richard<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>'s lot; and for satisfaction to Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> for <strong>the</strong> said Bury<strong>in</strong>gplace,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> fenc<strong>in</strong>g about it, he is to have a parcel <strong>of</strong> land ly<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> North<br />

Meadow gate; (<strong>the</strong> Cow-yard: conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g about an acre and a half <strong>of</strong> ground.)"<br />

" The said Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> is to have part <strong>of</strong> John Sk<strong>in</strong>ner's lot, on which<br />

<strong>the</strong> said John Sk<strong>in</strong>ner's house stands; and <strong>the</strong> said John Sk<strong>in</strong>ner is to remove<br />

his dwell<strong>in</strong>g house." " Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> is to trans-sill his house that stands<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> Bury<strong>in</strong>g-place and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> town is to remove it to <strong>the</strong> lot, <strong>the</strong> same,<br />

Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> receives <strong>of</strong> John Sk<strong>in</strong>ner." This lot <strong>of</strong> John Sk<strong>in</strong>ner's was<br />

No. 48, next north <strong>of</strong> Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong>'s lot No. 49.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first persons buried <strong>the</strong>re was probably his Uncle James<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>.<br />

From his own<strong>in</strong>g a house <strong>in</strong> Hartford, it is probable that he was married<br />

before 1640.<br />

On June 19, 1650, articles <strong>of</strong> agreement were drawn up for <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong><br />

" Norwalke," from Roger Ludlow, <strong>of</strong> Fairfield, Conn., and at a session <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

General Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Colony, <strong>the</strong> 26th <strong>of</strong> June, 1650, Nathaniel Ely and Richard<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong> <strong>in</strong> behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>of</strong> Hartford, desired <strong>the</strong><br />

leave and approbation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court for (<strong>the</strong>) plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Norwalk, to whom an<br />

affirmative answer was returned Sept. 11, 1651: " it was ordered that Norwalk<br />

should be a town."<br />

Richard <strong>Olmsted</strong> moved to Norwalk <strong>in</strong> 1650 or 1651, as his name appears<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> deed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indian Chiefs dated Feb. 15, 1651. The land purchased<br />

from Roger Ludlow comprised only <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town. The purchase<br />

price was fifteen pounds with some additional considerations. The<br />

central part <strong>of</strong> Norwalk had been orig<strong>in</strong>ally purchased by Capt. Patrick <strong>of</strong><br />

Greenwich, but <strong>the</strong> payment had never been completed to <strong>the</strong> satisfaction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Indians. The amount still ow<strong>in</strong>g, viz.: " two Indian coates and fowre<br />

fathom <strong>of</strong> wampam " was made good to <strong>the</strong>m and that part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town also<br />

acquired. The additional land secured from <strong>the</strong> Indian chiefs, Feb. 15, 1651,<br />

" for <strong>the</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong> Thirtie Fathum <strong>of</strong> Wampum, Tenn Kettles, Fifteen<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!