15.08.2013 Views

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.32 We recommend that<br />

(1) all other evidence <strong>of</strong> bad character should be admissible only with<br />

the leave <strong>of</strong> the court, and<br />

(2) leave should be granted only if the evidence falls with<strong>in</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

exceptions we recommend below.<br />

8.33 The def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> bad character is key, and appears at the head <strong>of</strong> the Bill, <strong>in</strong><br />

clause 1. Clause 2 then describes the circumstances <strong>in</strong> which leave is not required<br />

for evidence <strong>of</strong> bad character to be admissible. The aim here is to “r<strong>in</strong>g-fence”<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence itself, and it is important that this subclause del<strong>in</strong>eates<br />

the boundary around the central set <strong>of</strong> facts as accurately as possible. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> the examples given <strong>in</strong> the explanatory notes is to give as clear an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication as we can where the boundaries lie. 11 The section would, <strong>of</strong> course, be<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> the light <strong>of</strong> the other clauses <strong>in</strong> the Bill, and that fact <strong>in</strong> itself would<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that it, and <strong>in</strong> particular subsection (1)(a), is not an open door through<br />

which any evidence, however loose its connection with the charges, might pass.<br />

8.34 The structure <strong>of</strong> the Bill is put <strong>in</strong>to diagrammatic form on the next page.<br />

11 We note that a court may have recourse, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> clarification, to explanatory<br />

notes attached to a statute, as stated by Lord Hope <strong>in</strong> A [2001] UKHL 25, para [82].<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!