15.08.2013 Views

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Special cases where bad character evidence is admissible <strong>in</strong><br />

chief<br />

iv<br />

Paragraph Page<br />

Section 27(3) <strong>of</strong> the Theft Act 1968 2.27 16<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> section 27(3) 2.29 17<br />

Section 1(2) <strong>of</strong> the Official Secrets Act 1911 2.31 17<br />

Special cases where bad character evidence is <strong>in</strong>admissible <strong>in</strong><br />

chief<br />

Spent convictions 2.33 18<br />

(II): <strong>Evidence</strong> adduced by the defendant 2.39 20<br />

<strong>Evidence</strong> adduced aga<strong>in</strong>st a co-accused 2.40 20<br />

Is there a discretion to exclude defence evidence? 2.41 21<br />

(III): Adduc<strong>in</strong>g bad character evidence <strong>in</strong> cross-exam<strong>in</strong>ation 2.43 21<br />

The mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> section 1(f) 2.45 22<br />

The relationship between section 1(e) and section 1(f) 2.48 23<br />

Section 1(f)(i) 2.50 23<br />

The first limb <strong>of</strong> section 1(f)(ii): assert<strong>in</strong>g good character 2.53 24<br />

What is an assertion <strong>of</strong> good character? 2.55 25<br />

<strong>Character</strong> is <strong>in</strong>divisible 2.59 25<br />

The discretion to exclude 2.61 26<br />

Common law rules 2.62 27<br />

The second limb <strong>of</strong> section 1(f)(ii): cast<strong>in</strong>g imputations aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

prosecution witnesses 2.63 27<br />

The pre-conditions 2.64 27<br />

Sexual cases 2.68 29<br />

The discretion to exclude 2.71 30<br />

Similarity <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences 2.73 30<br />

Where the convictions do not reveal dishonesty 2.74 31<br />

Defence necessarily <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g imputations 2.75 31<br />

Section 1(f)(iii): attack<strong>in</strong>g a co-defendant 2.77 32<br />

“has given evidence” 2.78 33<br />

“aga<strong>in</strong>st any other person charged <strong>in</strong> the same proceed<strong>in</strong>gs” 2.80 33<br />

When section 1(f)(iii) is <strong>in</strong>voked 2.85 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!