Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission
Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission
Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Evidence</strong> Bill 3<br />
6 Defendant’s bad character<br />
Defendants<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> the defendant’s bad character, the court is not to give<br />
leave under section 2 unless the evidence falls with<strong>in</strong> section 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11.<br />
7 <strong>Evidence</strong> with explanatory value<br />
(1) <strong>Evidence</strong> falls with<strong>in</strong> this section if the follow<strong>in</strong>g three conditions are met.<br />
(2) The first condition is that, without the evidence, the court or jury would f<strong>in</strong>d it<br />
impossible or difficult properly to understand other evidence <strong>in</strong> the case.<br />
(3) The second condition is that the value <strong>of</strong> the evidence for understand<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
case as a whole is substantial.<br />
(4) The third condition is that the court is satisfied—<br />
(a) that, <strong>in</strong> all the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case, the evidence carries no risk <strong>of</strong><br />
prejudice to the defendant, or<br />
(b) that the value <strong>of</strong> the evidence for understand<strong>in</strong>g the case as a whole is<br />
such that, tak<strong>in</strong>g account <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> prejudice, the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> justice<br />
nevertheless require the evidence to be admissible.<br />
8 <strong>Evidence</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g to a matter <strong>in</strong> issue<br />
(1) <strong>Evidence</strong> falls with<strong>in</strong> this section if the follow<strong>in</strong>g two conditions are met.<br />
(2) The first condition is that the evidence has substantial probative value <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to a matter which—<br />
(a) is a matter <strong>in</strong> issue <strong>in</strong> the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, and<br />
(b) is <strong>of</strong> substantial importance <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> the case as a whole.<br />
(3) The second condition is that the court is satisfied—<br />
(a) that, <strong>in</strong> all the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case, the evidence carries no risk <strong>of</strong><br />
prejudice to the defendant, or<br />
(b) that, tak<strong>in</strong>g account <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> prejudice, the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> justice<br />
nevertheless require the evidence to be admissible <strong>in</strong> view <strong>of</strong>—<br />
(i) how much probative value it has <strong>in</strong> relation to the matter <strong>in</strong><br />
issue,<br />
(ii) what other evidence has been, or can be, given on that matter,<br />
and<br />
(iii) how important that matter is <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> the case as a<br />
whole.<br />
(4) In determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether the two conditions are met the court must have regard<br />
to the factors listed <strong>in</strong> section 5(2) (and to any others it considers relevant).<br />
(5) For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section, whether the defendant has a propensity to be<br />
untruthful is not to be regarded as a matter <strong>in</strong> issue <strong>in</strong> the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
(6) Only prosecution evidence can fall with<strong>in</strong> this section.<br />
9 <strong>Evidence</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g to credibility<br />
(1) This section applies only where—<br />
5<br />
10<br />
15<br />
20<br />
25<br />
30<br />
35<br />
40