15.08.2013 Views

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On a prosecution under this section, 66 it shall not be necessary to<br />

show that the accused person was guilty <strong>of</strong> any particular act tend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to show a purpose prejudicial to the safety or <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> the State,<br />

and, notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g that no such act is proved aga<strong>in</strong>st him, he may<br />

be convicted if, from the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case, or his conduct, or<br />

his known character as proved, it appears that his purpose was a<br />

purpose prejudicial to the safety or <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> the State …<br />

2.32 In the consultation paper we noted that this section constitutes an exception to<br />

the general exclusionary rule at common law that evidence <strong>of</strong> a defendant’s bad<br />

character may not be adduced as part <strong>of</strong> the prosecution case. 67 Therefore, the<br />

provision runs contrary to the usual pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> justice. Whether or not it<br />

represents a defect <strong>in</strong> the present law depends very much on whether it is viewed<br />

as a defensible special case. We discuss this provision at paragraphs 11.56 – 11.61<br />

below.<br />

Special cases where bad character evidence is <strong>in</strong>admissible <strong>in</strong> chief<br />

SPENT CONVICTIONS<br />

2.33 The philosophy <strong>of</strong> the Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Offenders Act 1974 68 is that, once a<br />

conviction is “spent”, the rehabilitated person should be treated <strong>in</strong> law as a<br />

person who has not been convicted <strong>of</strong> or charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence. The Act does<br />

not apply to the use <strong>of</strong> convictions <strong>in</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. 69 Nevertheless, a<br />

Practice Direction has been issued 70 under which “it is recommended that both<br />

court and counsel should give effect to the general <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>of</strong> Parliament by<br />

never referr<strong>in</strong>g to a spent conviction [<strong>of</strong> a defendant or a witness] when such<br />

reference can be reasonably avoided”. 71 To achieve this aim, no party may refer <strong>in</strong><br />

open court to a spent conviction without the authority <strong>of</strong> the judge or<br />

66 Section 1(1) <strong>of</strong> the Act, as amended by the Official Secrets Act 1920, ss 10, 11(2),<br />

Schedules 1 and 2, provides:<br />

If any person for any purpose prejudicial to the safety or <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> the State –<br />

(a) approaches, <strong>in</strong>spects, passes over or is <strong>in</strong> the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong>, or enters any<br />

prohibited place … ; or (b) makes any sketch, plan, model, or note which is<br />

calculated to be or might be or is <strong>in</strong>tended to be directly or <strong>in</strong>directly useful to<br />

an enemy; or (c) obta<strong>in</strong>s, collects, records, or publishes, or communicates to any<br />

other person any secret <strong>of</strong>ficial code word or pass word, or any sketch, plan,<br />

model, article, or note, or other document or <strong>in</strong>formation which is calculated to<br />

be or might be or is <strong>in</strong>tended to be directly or <strong>in</strong>directly useful to an enemy; he<br />

shall be guilty <strong>of</strong> [an <strong>of</strong>fence].<br />

67 See para 3.5 and n 3 <strong>of</strong> the consultation paper.<br />

68 The 1974 Act was the result <strong>of</strong> the report Liv<strong>in</strong>g it Down (1972) published by a committee<br />

set up by JUSTICE, the Howard League and the National Association for the Care and<br />

Resettlement <strong>of</strong> Offenders.<br />

69 Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Offenders Act 1974, s 7(2)(a).<br />

70 Practice Direction (Crime: Spent Convictions) [1975] 1 WLR 1065. See Appendix A <strong>of</strong> the<br />

consultation paper for the text <strong>of</strong> the Direction.<br />

71 Practice Direction (Crime: Spent Convictions) [1975] 1 WLR 1065, para 4.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!