15.08.2013 Views

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10<br />

Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Evidence</strong> Bill<br />

“defendant”, <strong>in</strong> relation to crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, means a person charged<br />

with an <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>in</strong> those proceed<strong>in</strong>gs; and “co-defendant”, <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

a defendant, means a person charged with an <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>in</strong> the same<br />

proceed<strong>in</strong>gs;<br />

“misconduct” means—<br />

(a) the commission <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence, or<br />

(b) behaviour <strong>of</strong> a k<strong>in</strong>d that, <strong>in</strong> the op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the court, might be<br />

viewed with disapproval by a reasonable person;<br />

“prejudice”, <strong>in</strong> relation to an item <strong>of</strong> evidence and a defendant, is to be<br />

read <strong>in</strong> accordance with subsection (2);<br />

“probative value” is to be read <strong>in</strong> accordance with section 14;<br />

“prosecution evidence” means evidence which is to be (or has been)<br />

adduced by the prosecution, or which a witness is to be <strong>in</strong>vited to give<br />

(or has given) <strong>in</strong> cross-exam<strong>in</strong>ation by the prosecution.<br />

(2) For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Act evidence carries a risk <strong>of</strong> prejudice to a defendant<br />

where—<br />

(a) there is a risk that the court or jury would attach undue weight to the<br />

evidence, or<br />

(b) the nature <strong>of</strong> the matters with which the evidence deals is such as to<br />

give rise to a risk that the court or jury would f<strong>in</strong>d the defendant guilty<br />

without be<strong>in</strong>g satisfied that he was.<br />

(3) Where a defendant is charged with two or more <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>in</strong> the same crim<strong>in</strong>al<br />

proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, this Act has effect as if each <strong>of</strong>fence were charged <strong>in</strong> separate<br />

proceed<strong>in</strong>gs; and references to the <strong>of</strong>fence with which the defendant is charged<br />

are to be read accord<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />

18 Armed forces<br />

Schedule 1 (armed forces) has effect.<br />

19 M<strong>in</strong>or and consequential amendments<br />

(1) In section 6 <strong>of</strong> the Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedure Act 1865 (c. 18) (witness’s conviction for<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence may be proved if not admitted)—<br />

(a) for “A witness may be” substitute “If, upon a witness be<strong>in</strong>g lawfully”;<br />

(b) omit “and upon be<strong>in</strong>g so questioned, if”.<br />

(2) In section 1(2) <strong>of</strong> the Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Evidence</strong> Act 1898 (c. 36) (restriction <strong>of</strong> privilege<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st self-<strong>in</strong>crim<strong>in</strong>ation where defendant gives evidence) at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>sert “Subject to section 6 <strong>of</strong> the Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Evidence</strong> Act 2001 (<strong>in</strong>admissibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> defendant’s bad character),”.<br />

(3) In section 16(2) <strong>of</strong> the Children and Young Persons Act 1963 (c. 37) (<strong>of</strong>fences<br />

committed by person under 14 disregarded for purposes <strong>of</strong> evidence relat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to previous convictions) for the words from “notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g” to the end<br />

substitute “even though the Crim<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Evidence</strong> Act 2001 would not prevent the<br />

question from be<strong>in</strong>g asked.”<br />

20 Repeals etc<br />

(1) The common law rules govern<strong>in</strong>g the admissibility <strong>of</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> bad<br />

character <strong>in</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs are abolished.<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!