16.08.2013 Views

Download (5Mb) - Covenant University Repository

Download (5Mb) - Covenant University Repository

Download (5Mb) - Covenant University Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dH/dt nT/min (Obs)<br />

AE nT (Obs)<br />

Dst nT(Obs)<br />

120<br />

100<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Equation 16<br />

Falayi and Beloff 1193<br />

r = 0.980<br />

R 2 = 0.961<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

dH/dt nT/min (Pred)<br />

Equation 17<br />

r = 0.949<br />

R 2 = 0.901<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500<br />

AE nT (Pred)<br />

Equation 18<br />

r = 0.925<br />

R 2 = 0.856<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450<br />

Dst nT (Pred)<br />

Fig. 5. Comparison between observed and predicted<br />

values of the correlation coefficient at St John.<br />

Figure 6 illustrates the comparison between observed and<br />

predicted values of the correlation coefficient at Addis<br />

Ababa. From equation (19/ Table 2d) a correlation<br />

coefficient of 0.859 exists between time derivatives of the<br />

horizontal geomagnetic field, the auroral electrojet and<br />

disturbance storm time. The coefficient of determination<br />

of 0.739 implies 73.9 % of time derivatives of the<br />

horizontal magnetic field can be accounted for by using<br />

the auroral electrojet and disturbance storm time.<br />

Addis Ababa<br />

dH/dt nT/min (Obs)<br />

dH/dt nT/min (Obs)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Equation 19<br />

r = 0.859<br />

R 2 = 0.7387<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

dH/dt nT/min (Pred)<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Equation 20<br />

r = 0.853<br />

R 2 = 0.727<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

dH/dt nT/min (Pred)<br />

Fig. 6. Comparison between observed and predicted<br />

values of the correlation coefficient at Addis Ababa.<br />

Figure 7 shows the comparison between observed and<br />

predicted values of the correlation coefficient at Bangui.<br />

Equation (21/ Table 2e) shows a correlation coefficient of<br />

0.952 that exists between time derivatives of the<br />

horizontal geomagnetic field, the auroral electrojet and<br />

disturbance storm time. The coefficient of determination<br />

of 0.907 implies 90.7% of time derivatives of the<br />

horizontal magnetic field can be accounted for by the<br />

using auroral electrojet and disturbance storm time.<br />

Bangui<br />

dH/dt nT/min ( Obs)<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Equation 21<br />

r = 0.952<br />

R 2 = 0.907<br />

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />

dH/dt nT/min (Pred)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!