An Analysis on Danish Micro Data - School of Economics and ...
An Analysis on Danish Micro Data - School of Economics and ...
An Analysis on Danish Micro Data - School of Economics and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The pooled probit does not make use <strong>of</strong> the panel data structure <strong>of</strong> the data, since the fact that<br />
individuals reoccur several times is not exploited. Panel data methods exist that are able to take this<br />
reoccurrence into account. A r<strong>and</strong>om effects probit estimator is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> these methods. When<br />
working with panel data methods it is assumed that observati<strong>on</strong>s over time bel<strong>on</strong>ging to the same<br />
individual are more alike than observati<strong>on</strong>s coming from independent individuals. 65 In other words<br />
it is assumed that each individual has an individual specific comp<strong>on</strong>ent, C i , that does not change<br />
over time <strong>and</strong> is unobserved.<br />
The most important assumpti<strong>on</strong> in the unobserved effects probit model is the following:<br />
( Y = 1 X , C ) = P(<br />
Y = 1 X , C ) = Φ(<br />
X β C )<br />
P +<br />
it<br />
i<br />
i<br />
it<br />
From this assumpti<strong>on</strong> it appears that Xit is strictly exogenous c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>on</strong> Ci, the unobserved<br />
individual specific comp<strong>on</strong>ent. Furthermore, Ci is added <strong>on</strong> to the probit index.<br />
Also it is assumed that the dependent variable is independent c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>on</strong> the explanatory<br />
variables <strong>and</strong> the individual specific comp<strong>on</strong>ent,<br />
The density <strong>of</strong> Yit given Xi <strong>and</strong> Ci looks as follows<br />
f<br />
it<br />
i<br />
( i.<br />
i.<br />
d )<br />
it<br />
Yi , K , YiT<br />
X i , Ci<br />
~<br />
[5.4]<br />
1<br />
T<br />
( Y , K , Y X , C ; β ) = f ( Y X , C ; β )<br />
1<br />
Yt<br />
1−Yt<br />
where f ( Y X , C;<br />
) = Φ(<br />
X β + C)<br />
[ 1−<br />
Φ(<br />
X β + C)<br />
]<br />
t<br />
t<br />
T<br />
i<br />
i<br />
t<br />
∏<br />
t=<br />
1<br />
t<br />
it<br />
t<br />
i<br />
β [5.5]<br />
Different assumpti<strong>on</strong>s about the correlati<strong>on</strong> between the explanatory variables <strong>and</strong> the individual<br />
specific comp<strong>on</strong>ent can be made. In the case <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om effects it is assumed that the individual<br />
specific comp<strong>on</strong>ent is independent <strong>of</strong> the explanatory variables <strong>and</strong> has a normal distributi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
2 ( 0,<br />
)<br />
Ci X i ~ Normal σ C<br />
[5.6]<br />
The unobserved effects probit model can be estimated with c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al likelihood methods <strong>and</strong> is<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten called the r<strong>and</strong>om effects probit estimator. The unobserved Ci are integrated out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the dependent variables c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>on</strong> the explanatory variables,<br />
where ( Y X ,C;<br />
β )<br />
f t<br />
f<br />
∞<br />
⎡<br />
⎤<br />
K =<br />
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞<br />
⎥⎜<br />
1 ⎟φ⎜<br />
C<br />
⎟dc<br />
[5.7]<br />
⎠<br />
T<br />
( Y1,<br />
, Y X i ; θ ) ∫ ⎢∏<br />
f ( Yt<br />
X it , C;<br />
β )<br />
T<br />
− ∞⎣<br />
=<br />
⎦⎝<br />
σ<br />
t<br />
C ⎠ ⎝ σ<br />
1<br />
C<br />
t is equal to equati<strong>on</strong> [5.5] <strong>and</strong> θ c<strong>on</strong>tains β <strong>and</strong><br />
65 Johnst<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> DiNardo (1997)<br />
2<br />
σ C .<br />
i<br />
49