18.08.2013 Views

BIO-CULTURAL COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS - Portal do Professor

BIO-CULTURAL COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS - Portal do Professor

BIO-CULTURAL COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS - Portal do Professor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART I / CHAPTER 1<br />

• We hold precious all life in its natural form. The harmonious<br />

progress of the natural order in the environment shapes<br />

and defines healthy genetic diversity.<br />

• We oppose the patenting of all natural genetic materials.<br />

We hold that life cannot be bought, owned, sold, discovered<br />

or patented, even in its smallest form.<br />

• We denounce and identify the instruments of intellectual<br />

property rights, patent law, and apparatus of informed<br />

consent as tools of legalized western deception and theft.<br />

These declarations constitute a statement of values that<br />

counter the legal subject with what can be called the “biospiritual<br />

self”. The bio-spiritual self is an expression of a<br />

“connective imagination,” 6<br />

which is a way of being in the<br />

world that sees the self as embedded within a network of<br />

relationships with land, water, plants, and animals, expressed<br />

through culture and integrated into customary laws. 7<br />

The results of this intimate relationship can be understood<br />

as forming a landscape in which humans have had to adapt<br />

to the land, and in <strong>do</strong>ing so have also adapted the land. They<br />

emphasize that the bio-cultural foundations of their<br />

traditional knowledge cannot be seen as separate from<br />

the land and animals, their culture, and spiritual beliefs,<br />

4. TK as a Commodity and its Impact on ILCs<br />

The reduction of Article 8(j) in the current negotiations of<br />

the WGABS to a provision that grants intellectual property<br />

rights to ILCs over their TK and affirms their right to trade it<br />

in exchange for benefits is a result of conflating the legal<br />

subject under Article 15 with the bio-cultural self that<br />

Article 8(j) seeks to affirm.<br />

The State as the legal subject under Article 15 is typical of the<br />

legal subject within contemporary jurisprudence as a selfenclosed<br />

bearer of proprietary rights over GR that it can use<br />

and transfer to others. Article 8(j), on the other hand, juxtaposes<br />

this legal subject with the bio-spiritual self that emerges from<br />

a bio-cultural way of life. As illustrated above, the bio-spiritual<br />

6 . Kakar, Sudhir, Mad and Divine: Spirit and Psyche in the Modern World, Penguin India: New Delhi, 2008, p.154.<br />

7 . This issue is further discussed in Chapter 7 that addresses Bio-cultural Jurisprudence.<br />

A <strong>BIO</strong>-<strong>CULTURAL</strong> CRITIQUE OF THE CBD AND ABS<br />

or outside the framework of their customary laws - in other<br />

words, each community’s endemic way of life. Specifically,<br />

the knowledge, innovations and practices of ILCs have<br />

developed out of their interactions with nature and are<br />

indispensable to their ways of life. In Chapter 2, a number of<br />

communities speak to this issue, highlighting how important<br />

their TK is to their everyday lives, such as healing community<br />

members and animals, knowing where to find pasture in dry<br />

lands and using sustainable harvesting techniques among<br />

other means to support their ways of life. Thus TK is not an<br />

end product of a traditional lifestyle, but critical to<br />

communities’ day-to-day lives.<br />

Such a way of life is based on spiritual foundations and cultural<br />

practices that understand the self very differently from the<br />

legal subject that underlies the property rights discourse.<br />

The challenge then for the potential IRABS is to ensure that<br />

the effective implementation of the in situ conservation<br />

objective of Article 8(j) extends beyond acknowledging<br />

intellectual property rights of ILCs over their TK and towards<br />

affirming, safeguarding and promoting the foundations of<br />

their bio-cultural ways of life, such as access to and<br />

management of their natural resources, to which TK is integral.<br />

self is rooted in an ethical framework that is oriented less<br />

towards affirming the proprietary rights of the subject over<br />

the ecosystem than towards upholding a bio-cultural<br />

relationship between the bio-spiritual self and nature.<br />

Interpreting Article 8(j) as a provision that is restricted only to<br />

affirming the intellectual property rights of ILCs over their TK<br />

and not as a right to a bio-cultural way of life has had the<br />

adverse consequence of forcing ILCs to organize themselves<br />

along the lines of a legal subject, where the community<br />

identity is incorporated like any other corporation and their<br />

culture is commodified as a tradable good.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!