18.08.2013 Views

BIO-CULTURAL COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS - Portal do Professor

BIO-CULTURAL COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS - Portal do Professor

BIO-CULTURAL COMMUNITY PROTOCOLS - Portal do Professor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART I / CHAPTER 2<br />

Overall, BCPs are a statement by ILCs of their intentions to selfdetermine<br />

their futures and explain to specific stakeholders<br />

how they either wish to engage them or be engaged.<br />

BCPs present an opportunity for communities to set out their<br />

customary laws relating to FPIC regarding access to their TK<br />

and/or GR and how they want to use new opportunities such<br />

as the establishment of a protected area, a REDD project, or<br />

a payments for ecosystem services scheme. 2<br />

In <strong>do</strong>ing so, ILCs<br />

provide clarity to other stakeholders, better enabling<br />

researchers of government agencies, for example, to work<br />

with them towards the community’s proposals. Thus, BCPs<br />

provide communities an opportunity to focus on their<br />

development aspirations vis-à-vis legal frameworks such as<br />

ABS and to articulate for themselves and for others the<br />

processes that require support to protect their bio-cultural<br />

heritage, and therefore on what basis they will engage with<br />

potential users of their TK.<br />

For example, Samburu livestock keepers from Kenya said the<br />

following about the reasons for developing a BCP:<br />

We are the Samburu, pastoralists living across a number of<br />

districts in Kenya. We are keepers of indigenous and exotic<br />

breeds of livestock and our lives are interlinked with and wholly<br />

3. Community Experiences with BCPs<br />

3.1 Self-determination and Governance<br />

New legal and policy frameworks are providing communities<br />

with new opportunities to use the law to protect their ways<br />

of life, but at the same time are posing corresponding<br />

challenges. The IRABS’ focus on TK raises questions about its<br />

applicability to the way communities are defined and organized<br />

locally. A certain type of TK can be known by a subset of a<br />

community (traditional healers, for example), may be widely<br />

shared between communities or might be used across national<br />

borders. To respond to any issues relating to TK, the “community”<br />

of TK holders must first define themselves and consider who<br />

should make decisions relating to their bio-cultural heritage<br />

and overall governance.<br />

<strong>BIO</strong>-<strong>CULTURAL</strong> <strong>COMMUNITY</strong> <strong>PROTOCOLS</strong> AS A<br />

<strong>COMMUNITY</strong>-BASED RESPONSE TO THE CBD<br />

dependent on our animals. Our way of life also allows us to<br />

live alongside wildlife, promoting the conservation of our<br />

breeds and other living resources in our environment. Yet we<br />

feel that our way of life and our indigenous breeds have been<br />

consistently undervalued. The government-promoted breeding<br />

programs that sought to replace or improve our breeds have<br />

left us particularly vulnerable to the recurring droughts which<br />

are causing our people acute suffering.<br />

This is our community protocol. It is an articulation of the<br />

integral role of our breeds in Samburu culture and their<br />

importance to the world. It seeks to establish the significance<br />

of our way of life and the value of our indigenous breeds, and<br />

that as the keepers of important livestock populations, we<br />

have a right to maintain our way of life. It clarifies for others<br />

on what terms we will permit activities to be undertaken on<br />

our land or regarding our indigenous breeds and<br />

traditional knowledge. 3<br />

The next section below illustrates the types of issues<br />

highlighted by the communities as being important to their<br />

ways of life and also provides an overview of the way in which<br />

they have set out their values, concerns, challenges, and legal<br />

rights in BCPs.<br />

The issue of applicability to the local context had the most<br />

impact on the traditional healers from Bushbuckridge in the<br />

Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Region. At first, the organization<br />

was introduced to a group of 6 people who run the<br />

Vukuzenzele Medicinal Plants Nursery to discuss their rights<br />

under the South African Bio-prospecting and ABS Regulations<br />

of 2008. It soon became evident that there were many more<br />

healers in the region who knew of each other but had never<br />

met formally to discuss mutual concerns. As a result, a larger<br />

group representing two different languages was invited to<br />

the next meeting to discuss their ideas. At that and subsequent<br />

meetings, they realized that they faced many of the same<br />

challenges, including a lack of access to medicinal plants because<br />

of over-harvesting by commercial harvesters, a lack of<br />

2. Payments for ecosystem services are discussed in Chapter 6.<br />

3. Samburu Bio-cultural Protocol (working draft). For more information contact Jacob Wanyama and Evelyn Mathias, LIFE Network (Africa) at evelyn@mamud.com<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!