26.08.2013 Views

yearbook 2004/05 - The European Film College

yearbook 2004/05 - The European Film College

yearbook 2004/05 - The European Film College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to recover its image as an art form,<br />

rather its standard and quality have<br />

been gradually deteriorating. It is<br />

said that contemporary cinema only<br />

meets the taste of a section of the<br />

people. <strong>The</strong> audiences who still go to<br />

cinema halls tend to be less educated<br />

and belong to the low-income group<br />

i.e. the working class people of the<br />

society. It fits with the notion of Jane<br />

Adams who termed the movie theatre<br />

a ‘Dream Palace’ where the urban<br />

working class might get the scope to<br />

perpetuate their dream.2 But this is<br />

not the entire reason for this<br />

change in demographic of<br />

the cinema audience. We saw<br />

a tremendous technological<br />

boom in the media and communication<br />

sphere in last<br />

two decades. As the middle<br />

class are economically well<br />

off, they also have access to alternative forms<br />

of entertainment, VCR, cable<br />

TV, VCD/DVD and the<br />

Internet, which have brought<br />

them much wider options.<br />

Big budget Hollywood films,<br />

the Mumbai glamour world,<br />

the vastness of cyberspace<br />

with chat rooms and various<br />

pornographic options can be<br />

found as well as newly released<br />

Bangla cinema, which is also easily accessible<br />

through those new technologies. So the state<br />

of audience at the cinema halls in Bangladesh<br />

has been found to be one in a state of change.<br />

Before going on to review the film audience in<br />

Bangladesh it could be relevant to discuss the<br />

concept of “audience” itself.<br />

Audience: <strong>The</strong> concept<br />

Actually the concept of ‘audience’ had not registered<br />

among the media scholars as a culturally<br />

significant one until 1980s. 3 For the first<br />

FROM THE STUDENTS<br />

time, Denis McQuail drew the attention<br />

regarding media audience in 1983 in his<br />

book Mass Communication <strong>The</strong>ory. 4 He<br />

found that the media audience was an important<br />

entity and defined the audience<br />

as an aggregate of spectators, readers, listeners<br />

and viewers. He also termed the audience<br />

as ‘mass’, ‘public or social group’ and ‘market’.<br />

In postmodern a approach, the reader (movie<br />

viewer) is the prime concern, text (movie) and<br />

author (director of the movie) is less important.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore more attention is supposed to be paid<br />

to the audience in the contemporary cine-world<br />

although the producers, artists, distributors and<br />

the audience cohere together in the process of<br />

filmmaking and projection. <strong>The</strong>y control each<br />

other as Jarvie (1970: 42) says:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!