Troels Dyhr Pedersen.indd - Solid Mechanics
Troels Dyhr Pedersen.indd - Solid Mechanics
Troels Dyhr Pedersen.indd - Solid Mechanics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Engine modification<br />
To obtain a lower CR than the original, the piston<br />
top was lowered to give a geometric CR of 14.3.<br />
This CR is empirically high enough to ensure<br />
ignition and complete combustion of very lean<br />
charges with DME. To enable further adjustment of<br />
the CR, a cylinder with an internal diameter of 25<br />
mm and an external diameter of 30 mm was<br />
inserted through the cylinder head to connect with<br />
the compression volume. The volume of the<br />
regulating cylinder could then be used to adjust the<br />
compression volume by the adjustment of a piston.<br />
To allow space for this arrangement, the existing<br />
passage for the fuel injection valve was expanded<br />
and used for the regulating cylinder. Figure 2<br />
illustrates the arrangement.<br />
With the regulating cylinder and piston arrangement,<br />
the compression volume is adjustable from 14.3 to<br />
8.8 by extracting the piston up to 50 mm out of the<br />
regulating cylinder.<br />
As both cylinder liner and regulating cylinder are<br />
subjected to the engine cooling water it is assumed<br />
that thermal conditions are approximately equal in<br />
both volumes. Combustion should therefore occur<br />
simultaneously in both volumes.<br />
Fuel injection system<br />
The DME was injected in pulses into the intake<br />
manifold of the modified cylinder by means of a<br />
standard gasoline injector with a free flow capacity<br />
of 190 g/min. The arrangement is seen in figure 1.<br />
The fuel supply tank was pressurized at 8 bars in<br />
order to avoid formation of vapor bubbles in the fuel<br />
supply line and near the injector. The amount of<br />
fuel per injection was calibrated using a precision<br />
scale with a resolution of 0.1 gram intervals to<br />
determine fuel consumption in 500 injections.<br />
Injection timing and duration was controlled using a<br />
programmable microcontroller. The signal from a<br />
quadratic encoder on the engine shaft was used as<br />
reference for the injection. In this study, the amount<br />
of fuel is kept constant for all speeds for each of the<br />
three target values of lambda. Volumetric efficiency<br />
is however not constant. For the three target values<br />
of lambda, the actual values are therefore slightly<br />
different, as shown in table 3.<br />
Table 3: Target and actual excess air ratios<br />
RPM 1000 2000 & 3000<br />
Target 2.50 3.0 4.0 2.5 3.0 4.0<br />
Fuel [mg] 25 20 15 25 20 15<br />
Inject. [ms] 4.7 3.6 2.5 4.7 3.6 2.5<br />
Vol. eff. 0.96 0.88<br />
Actual 2.45 3.06 4.08 2.25 2.81 3.74<br />
The variation in actual lambda is considered to be<br />
of less importance, as the concentration of fuel is<br />
limiting the rate in lean combustion and not the<br />
concentration of oxygen, which is abundant.<br />
Cylinder pressure data acquisition<br />
The cylinder pressure was measured using a Kistler<br />
6052A pressure transducer. A Kistler 5001 charge<br />
amplifier was used for amplification of the signal<br />
from the transducer. The acquisition of the pressure<br />
was made using a computer with a data acquisition<br />
card. The clock and trigger signals for the<br />
acquisition was supplied by an encoder with 3600<br />
pulses per revolution. TDC alignment was made by<br />
software correction.<br />
The setup used for acquiring the cylinder pressure<br />
was designed to provide a high resolution of the<br />
cylinder pressure, as the combustion durations<br />
were expected to be from 5 - 10 CAD. Thus, using<br />
a lower resolution such as 1 sample per CAD would<br />
be insufficient, as samples would not provide much<br />
information about the event. In addition, a sampling<br />
frequency at least 2.5 times higher than the highest<br />
frequency expected should be used to avoid<br />
aliasing.<br />
Emissions<br />
It is a common observation that the HCCI process<br />
with gaseous fuels does not produce soot, and that<br />
the emission of NO is very low due to the low peak<br />
temperatures of HCCI combustion. Those<br />
emissions are thus not the primary concern with<br />
this combustion principle and have therefore not<br />
been measured either.<br />
The emissions of CO2, CO and THC were<br />
measured with a Bosch ETT 8.55 portable exhaust<br />
analyzer. The emissions were monitored with the<br />
purpose of identifying the quality of the combustion,<br />
which was used to determine when satisfactory<br />
combustion occurred, and also when combustion<br />
was stabilized. It is easily seen from the values of<br />
hydrocarbons, CO and CO2 if the combustion<br />
process is at steady state or in transition.<br />
DATA TREATMENT<br />
Cylinder pressure data treatment<br />
Due to the nature of the HCCI combustion, one or<br />
more shockwaves of some amplitude always<br />
follows the combustion. The shockwave causes a<br />
resonating wave in the combustion chamber which<br />
is similar to that caused by knocking combustion.<br />
This phenomenon has been studied in detail by<br />
Vressner et al [14]. Apart from the noise emitted<br />
from the engine, knocking combustion is believed<br />
to enhance the heat transfer to the combustion<br />
chamber walls [15]. This is another good reason<br />
why engine knock must be limited.<br />
The frequency of the shockwaves observed is in<br />
the region of 4500 – 6000 Hz, with higher engine<br />
speeds and in-cylinder temperatures leading to<br />
higher frequencies. Wavelengths were determined<br />
by close examination of the oscillating parts of the<br />
pressure curves. The heat release analysis is<br />
heavily biased by these pressure pulsations, as<br />
these are interpreted as heat release as well as the