29.08.2013 Views

Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...

Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...

Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bibliography<br />

M. H. Christiansen. The (non) necessity <strong>of</strong> recursion <strong>in</strong> natural language. In Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Fourteenth Annual Conference <strong>of</strong> the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence<br />

Erlbaum Associates, 1992.<br />

M. H. Christiansen and N. Chater. Toward a connectionist model <strong>of</strong> recursion <strong>in</strong> human<br />

l<strong>in</strong>guistic performance. Cognitive Science, 23(2):157–205, 1999.<br />

M. H. Christiansen and M. C. MacDonald. Process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> recursive sentence structure:<br />

Test<strong>in</strong>g predictions from a connectionist model. Manuscript <strong>in</strong> preparation, 1999.<br />

L. Cohen and J. Mehler. Click monitor<strong>in</strong>g revisited: An on-l<strong>in</strong>e study <strong>of</strong> sentence<br />

comprehension. Memory & cognition, 24(1):94–102, 1996.<br />

M. Corley and S. Corley. Cross-l<strong>in</strong>guistic and <strong>in</strong>tra-l<strong>in</strong>guistic evidence for the use <strong>of</strong><br />

statistics <strong>in</strong> human sentence process<strong>in</strong>g. Unpublished manuscript, University <strong>of</strong> Exeter,<br />

1995.<br />

F. Cuetos, D. Mitchell, and M. Corley. Pars<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> different languages. Language process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> Spanish, pages 145–187, 1996.<br />

M. Daneman and P. A. Carpenter. Individual differences <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g memory and read<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Verbal Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Verbal Behavior, 19(4):450–66, 1980.<br />

G. S. Dell and P. G. O’Seaghdha. Stages <strong>of</strong> lexical access <strong>in</strong> language production.<br />

Cognition, 42(1-3):287–314, 1992.<br />

G. S. Dell, L. K. Burger, and W. R. Svec. Language production and serial order: A<br />

functional analysis and a model. Cognitive <strong>Model<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, 2002.<br />

T. Desmet and E. Gibson. Disambiguation preferences and corpus frequencies <strong>in</strong> noun<br />

phrase conjunction. Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 49(3):353–374, 2003.<br />

J. A. V. Dyke and R. L. Lewis. Dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g effects <strong>of</strong> structure and decay on attachment<br />

and repair: A cue-<strong>based</strong> pars<strong>in</strong>g account <strong>of</strong> recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 49(3):285–316, 2003.<br />

J. A. V. Dyke and B. McElree. Retrieval <strong>in</strong>terference <strong>in</strong> sentence comprehension. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 55(2):157–166, 2006.<br />

S. F. Ehrlich and K. Rayner. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g read<strong>in</strong>g. Journal <strong>of</strong> Verbal Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Verbal Behavior, 20:641–655, 1981.<br />

J. L. Elman. Tlearn simulator.<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware available at: http://crl.ucsd.edu/<strong>in</strong>nate/tlearn.html, 1992.<br />

J. L. Elman. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g structure <strong>in</strong> time. Cognitive Science, 14(2):179–211, 1990.<br />

IX

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!