Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bibliography<br />
P. Erdmann. Ist das deutsche e<strong>in</strong>e sov-sprache? Zeitschrift für deutsche Sprache und<br />
Literatur, 1990.<br />
F. Ferreira. The mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47<br />
(2):164–203, 2003.<br />
M. Ford. A method for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g measures <strong>of</strong> local pars<strong>in</strong>g complexity throughout<br />
sentences. Journal <strong>of</strong> Verbal Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Verbal Behavior, 22:203–218, 1983.<br />
K. I. Forster, C. Guerrera, and L. Elliot. The maze task: measur<strong>in</strong>g forced <strong>in</strong>cremental<br />
sentence process<strong>in</strong>g time. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2008.<br />
U. Frauenfelder and J. Segui. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g around the relative clause. Journal <strong>of</strong> Verbal<br />
Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Verbal Behavior, pages 19.328–37, 1980.<br />
L. Frazier. Syntactic process<strong>in</strong>g: Evidence from dutch. Natural language and l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
theory, 5(4):519–559, 1987.<br />
L. Frazier. On comprehend<strong>in</strong>g sentences: Synactic pars<strong>in</strong>g strategies. PhD thesis, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Connecticut, West Bend, IN., 1979.<br />
L. Frazier. Syntactic complexity. In D. R. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, and A. M. Zwicky,<br />
editors, Natural language pars<strong>in</strong>g: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives,<br />
pages 129–189. Cambridge University Press, 1985.<br />
L. Frazier and C. Clifton. Successive cyclicity <strong>in</strong> the grammar and the parser. Language<br />
and Cognitive Processes, 4:93–126, 1989.<br />
L. Frazier and C. Clifton. Construal. MIT Press, 1996.<br />
L. Frazier and G. B. Flores d’Arcais. Filler-driven pars<strong>in</strong>g: a study <strong>of</strong> gap fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
dutch. Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 28:331–344, 1989.<br />
L. Frazier, C. Clifton, and J. Randall. Fill<strong>in</strong>g gaps: Decision pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and structure <strong>in</strong><br />
sentence comprehension. Cognition, 13(2):187–222, 1983.<br />
E. Gibson. The dependency locality theory: A distance-<strong>based</strong> theory <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic complexity.<br />
In Image, language, bra<strong>in</strong>: Papers from the first m<strong>in</strong>d articulation project<br />
symposium, pages 95–126, 2000.<br />
E. Gibson. L<strong>in</strong>guistic complexity: locality <strong>of</strong> syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1):<br />
1–76, 1998.<br />
E. Gibson and C. T. Schütze. Disambiguation preferences <strong>in</strong> noun phrase conjunction<br />
do not mirror corpus frequency. Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 40(2):263–279,<br />
1999.<br />
X