29.08.2013 Views

Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...

Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...

Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bibliography<br />

R. S. Toml<strong>in</strong>. Basic word order: Functional pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. Croom Helm, London, 1986.<br />

M. J. Traxler, R. K. Morris, and R. E. Seely. Process<strong>in</strong>g subject and object relative<br />

clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 47(1):<br />

69–90, July 2002.<br />

S. Vasishth. Integration and prediction <strong>in</strong> head-f<strong>in</strong>al structures. In Process<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

Produc<strong>in</strong>g Head-F<strong>in</strong>al Structure. 2008.<br />

S. Vasishth and R. L. Lewis. Human language process<strong>in</strong>g: Symbolic models. In K. Brown,<br />

editor, Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Language and L<strong>in</strong>guistics, volume 5, pages 410–419. Elsevier,<br />

2006a.<br />

S. Vasishth and R. L. Lewis. Argument-head distance and process<strong>in</strong>g complexity: Expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

both locality and antilocality effects. Language, 82(4):767–794, 2006b.<br />

S. Vasishth, K. Suckow, R. Lewis, and S. Kern. Short-term forgett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sentence comprehension:<br />

Crossl<strong>in</strong>guistic evidence from head-f<strong>in</strong>al structures. Submitted to Language<br />

and Cognitive Processes, 2008.<br />

G. S. Waters and D. Caplan. The capacity theory <strong>of</strong> sentence comprehension: critique<br />

<strong>of</strong> just and carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4):761–72, 1996.<br />

J. B. Wells, M. H. Christiansen, D. S. Race, D. J. Acheson, and M. C. MacDonald. <strong>Experience</strong><br />

and sentence process<strong>in</strong>g: Statistical learn<strong>in</strong>g and relative clause comprehension.<br />

Cognitive Psychology, 58(2):250–271, 2009.<br />

M. Yoshida, S. Aoshima, and C. Phillips. Relative clause prediction <strong>in</strong> japanese. In<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human <strong>Sentence</strong> Process<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

College Park, Maryland, 2004.<br />

XVI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!