Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bibliography<br />
R. S. Toml<strong>in</strong>. Basic word order: Functional pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. Croom Helm, London, 1986.<br />
M. J. Traxler, R. K. Morris, and R. E. Seely. Process<strong>in</strong>g subject and object relative<br />
clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 47(1):<br />
69–90, July 2002.<br />
S. Vasishth. Integration and prediction <strong>in</strong> head-f<strong>in</strong>al structures. In Process<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Produc<strong>in</strong>g Head-F<strong>in</strong>al Structure. 2008.<br />
S. Vasishth and R. L. Lewis. Human language process<strong>in</strong>g: Symbolic models. In K. Brown,<br />
editor, Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Language and L<strong>in</strong>guistics, volume 5, pages 410–419. Elsevier,<br />
2006a.<br />
S. Vasishth and R. L. Lewis. Argument-head distance and process<strong>in</strong>g complexity: Expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
both locality and antilocality effects. Language, 82(4):767–794, 2006b.<br />
S. Vasishth, K. Suckow, R. Lewis, and S. Kern. Short-term forgett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sentence comprehension:<br />
Crossl<strong>in</strong>guistic evidence from head-f<strong>in</strong>al structures. Submitted to Language<br />
and Cognitive Processes, 2008.<br />
G. S. Waters and D. Caplan. The capacity theory <strong>of</strong> sentence comprehension: critique<br />
<strong>of</strong> just and carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4):761–72, 1996.<br />
J. B. Wells, M. H. Christiansen, D. S. Race, D. J. Acheson, and M. C. MacDonald. <strong>Experience</strong><br />
and sentence process<strong>in</strong>g: Statistical learn<strong>in</strong>g and relative clause comprehension.<br />
Cognitive Psychology, 58(2):250–271, 2009.<br />
M. Yoshida, S. Aoshima, and C. Phillips. Relative clause prediction <strong>in</strong> japanese. In<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human <strong>Sentence</strong> Process<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
College Park, Maryland, 2004.<br />
XVI