Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Connectionist Modeling of Experience-based Effects in Sentence ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bibliography<br />
F. Hsiao and E. Gibson. Process<strong>in</strong>g relative clauses <strong>in</strong> ch<strong>in</strong>ese. Cognition, 90(1):3–27,<br />
2003.<br />
C.-C. Hsu, F. Hurewitz, and C. Phillips. Contextual and syntactic cues for head-f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
relative clauses <strong>in</strong> ch<strong>in</strong>ese. In The 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human <strong>Sentence</strong><br />
Process<strong>in</strong>g, NY, 2006.<br />
T. Ishizuka, K. Nakatani, and E. Gibson. Process<strong>in</strong>g japanese relative clauses <strong>in</strong> context.<br />
In The 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human <strong>Sentence</strong> Process<strong>in</strong>g, CUNY<br />
Graduate Canter, NY, 2006.<br />
F. T. Jaeger, E. Fedorenko, P. H<strong>of</strong>meister, and E. Gibson. Expectation-<strong>based</strong> syntactic<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g: Antilocality outside <strong>of</strong> head-f<strong>in</strong>al languages. CUNY <strong>Sentence</strong> Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Conference, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a, 2008.<br />
C. Juliano and M. K. Tanenhaus. A constra<strong>in</strong>t-<strong>based</strong> lexicalist account <strong>of</strong> the subject/object<br />
attachment preference. Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychol<strong>in</strong>guistic Research, 23(6):459–471,<br />
1994.<br />
D. Jurafsky. A probabilistic model <strong>of</strong> lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation.<br />
Cognitive Science, 20(2):137–194, 1996.<br />
M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter. A capacity theory <strong>of</strong> comprehension: <strong>in</strong>dividual differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g memory. Psychological Review, 99(1):122–49, 1992.<br />
M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter. A capacity theory <strong>of</strong> comprehension: Individual differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g memory. Cognitive <strong>Model<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, pages 131–177, 2002.<br />
M. A. Just and S. Varma. A hybrid architecture for work<strong>in</strong>g memory: Reply to macdonald<br />
and christiansen (2002). Psychological Review, 109(1):55–65, 2002.<br />
M. A. Just, P. A. Carpenter, and J. D. Woolley. Paradigms and processes <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g<br />
comprehension. Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2):228–238, 1982.<br />
M. A. Just, P. A. Carpenter, T. A. Keller, W. F. Eddy, and K. R. Thulborn. Bra<strong>in</strong><br />
activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274(5284):114, 1996.<br />
A. Kawamoto. Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear dynamics <strong>in</strong> the resolution <strong>of</strong> lexical ambiguity: a parallel<br />
distributed process<strong>in</strong>g account. Journal <strong>of</strong> memory and language(Pr<strong>in</strong>t), 32(4):474–<br />
516, 1993.<br />
E. L. Keenan and B. Comrie. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. L<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
Inquiry, pages 63–99, 1977.<br />
J. K<strong>in</strong>g and M. A. Just. Individual differences <strong>in</strong> syntactic process<strong>in</strong>g: The role <strong>of</strong><br />
work<strong>in</strong>g memory. Journal <strong>of</strong> Memory and Language, 30(5):580–602, 1991.<br />
XII
Change language