01.09.2013 Views

Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC

Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC

Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SGC</strong> Rapport 2013:270<br />

2 Description <strong>of</strong> the available <strong>upgrading</strong> <strong>technologies</strong><br />

This chapter, which constitutes the main part <strong>of</strong> this report, aims to thoroughly describe<br />

the five <strong>commercial</strong>ly available <strong>upgrading</strong> <strong>technologies</strong>, amine scrubbing,<br />

water scrubbing, pressure swing adsorption, membrane separation and physical<br />

scrubbing with organic solvents. This chapter has been written in cooperation with<br />

several manufacturers <strong>of</strong> <strong>upgrading</strong> plants. Significant parts <strong>of</strong> the data have been<br />

supplied by the manufacturers, and compared with data from the literature. The<br />

investment costs are presented as intervals <strong>of</strong> specific investment cost, as it may<br />

vary with several factors, e.g. location, integration with existing equipment and<br />

other site specific information.<br />

2.1 Amine scrubbing<br />

This chapter has been written in cooperation between the authors and the company<br />

Purac Puregas which is active within the area <strong>of</strong> biogas <strong>upgrading</strong>.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> reactive systems for removing CO2 from biogas is not a brand new<br />

notion, but it is less common compared to other <strong>technologies</strong> such as PSA and<br />

water scrubbing. The synopsis <strong>of</strong> features <strong>of</strong> the technology is to use a reagent<br />

that chemically binds to the CO2 molecule, removing it from the gas. This is most<br />

commonly performed using a water solution <strong>of</strong> amines (molecules with carbon and<br />

nitrogen), with the reaction product being either in the molecular or ion form. The<br />

most common amines used historically for the purpose <strong>of</strong> sour gas removal (carbon<br />

dioxide and hydrogen sulphide) are methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), diethnolamine<br />

(DEA) and monoethanolamine (MEA) (Kohl & Nielsen 1997). Some <strong>of</strong><br />

these are still used, however, to the authors’ knowledge, the most common amine<br />

system used industrially today is a mixture <strong>of</strong> MDEA and piperazine (PZ) <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

termed activated MDEA (aMDEA). This system was introduced by BASF (Appl et<br />

al. 1982), but is today supplied by several major suppliers <strong>of</strong> chemical such as<br />

BASF, DOW chemicals and Taminco.<br />

This chapter will deal with the purification <strong>of</strong> biogas with water solutions <strong>of</strong><br />

amines, the general process layout, operation and the effect <strong>of</strong> contaminants as<br />

well as vendor information on costs and consumables.<br />

2.1.1 Process description<br />

Absorption <strong>of</strong> CO2 from biogas using amines in today’s biogas industry is mainly<br />

performed using aMDEA. The process may be described generically but actual<br />

vendors each have their variations <strong>of</strong> the process. In general terms the technology<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> an absorber, in which the CO2 is removed from the biogas, and a stripper<br />

in which the CO2 is removed from the amine solution. A general process overview<br />

is shown in Figure 3.<br />

16 Svenskt Gastekniskt Center AB, Malmö <strong>–</strong> www.sgc.se

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!