01.09.2013 Views

Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC

Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC

Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SGC</strong> Rapport 2013:270<br />

exit the stripper column in the top (6) and is cooled in a condenser. The condensate<br />

(mainly steam but with traces <strong>of</strong> amine) is returned to the stripper (7). The<br />

cooled gas stream will consist mainly <strong>of</strong> CO2 and if H2S is entered into the system<br />

it will leave it here. In the simplified flowsheet, there is no integration but the cooling<br />

loops may naturally be integrated. As the pH <strong>of</strong> the solution is quite high with<br />

the basic amines in solution, there is little to no risk <strong>of</strong> bacterial growth. Therefore<br />

any contactor may be used; trays, structured or random packing alike.<br />

As per the figure the generic amine system may be represented for systems<br />

ranging from small scale, such as biogas applications, to applications in the oil,<br />

gas and chemical industry with units several meters in diameter. The pressure is<br />

however most likely higher in the large industrial applications. More specific to the<br />

biogas case, there is usually gas sweetening (H2S removal) upstream <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

to avoid smell and material issues downstream. The product gas will also<br />

have to be dried before being used in an automotive or indeed any other application.<br />

This is done using temperature swing adsorption, pressure swing adsorption<br />

or freeze drying.<br />

2.1.2 Theoretical background<br />

The degree <strong>of</strong> purification <strong>of</strong> the amine-based systems may be viewed as follows.<br />

Under normal operating conditions, the system is operating close to what<br />

may be described as an ideal plug flow, with little or no back-mixing (at least for<br />

the purpose <strong>of</strong> describing an actual system). This means that one gas segment<br />

which is entered in the bottom <strong>of</strong> the column will pass through the column and<br />

shrink in size as the CO2 is removed from the gas segment, but it does not mix<br />

with other gas segments. The driving force <strong>of</strong> the absorption may be mainly ascribed<br />

to the level <strong>of</strong> CO2 in the gas as there is a surplus <strong>of</strong> amine in the system.<br />

Using this line <strong>of</strong> thinking it may be realized that, as there is no back-mixing, the<br />

purity <strong>of</strong> the exiting gas is based on the column height alone. It also explains why<br />

much temperature increase is seen in the bottom part <strong>of</strong> the column.<br />

With respect to throughput this is limited in the lower end by enabling contact between<br />

the gas and liquid through distributers etc. In the upper end, the throughput<br />

is limited by the lifting force <strong>of</strong> the flowing gas compared to the weight <strong>of</strong> the flowing<br />

liquid. This point is called the flooding point and may be expressed as<br />

ܨ = ௅<br />

ீ<br />

∗ ටቀఘಸ ቁ Eq. 1<br />

ఘಽ<br />

G is packing specific but is a function <strong>of</strong> the gas velocity, L is the liquid flow and it<br />

is weighted using the square root <strong>of</strong> the gas density divided by the liquid density.<br />

Using the flooding point <strong>of</strong> the packing, the gas velocity <strong>of</strong> flooding may be determined<br />

for the intended liquid flow rates. This maximum gas velocity is then used<br />

for setting the design gas velocity, usually 50-80% <strong>of</strong> the flooding gas velocity.<br />

Looking at a molecular level, there are several reactions that may take place (X.<br />

Zhang et al. 2001), they may however be summarized using the following equilibrium<br />

reactions<br />

ܥܱ ଶ + ܼܲ ∙ ܪ ଶܱ ↔ ܼܲܪ ା + ܪܥܱ ଷ ି Eq. 2<br />

ܥܱ ଶ + ܯ ܦܧܣ ∙ ܪ ଶܱ ↔ ܯ ܦܧܣܪ ା + ܪܥܱ ଷ ି Eq. 3<br />

18 Svenskt Gastekniskt Center AB, Malmö <strong>–</strong> www.sgc.se

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!