Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC
Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC
Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies - SGC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>SGC</strong> Rapport 2013:270<br />
2.3.1 Process description<br />
A typical and simplified design <strong>of</strong> a biogas <strong>upgrading</strong> unit based with membranes<br />
is shown in Figure 14.<br />
Figure 14 Typical design <strong>of</strong> a biogas <strong>upgrading</strong> unit with membranes<br />
The raw biogas is normally cleaned before compression to remove water and hydrogen<br />
sulfide. In cases where ammonia, siloxanes and volatile organic carbons<br />
are expected in significant concentrations, these components are also commonly<br />
removed before the biogas <strong>upgrading</strong>. The water is removed to prevent condensation<br />
during compression and hydrogen sulfide is removed since it will not be sufficiently<br />
separated by the membranes. The water is commonly removed by cooling<br />
and condensation while hydrogen sulfide commonly is removed with activated<br />
carbon. Additional to this cleaning, it is also common to have a particle filter to protect<br />
the compressor and the membranes.<br />
After gas cleaning, the biogas is compressed to 6-20 bar(a). The pressure that is<br />
used depends on requirements on the specific site as well as the design and manufacturer<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>upgrading</strong> unit. Since oil lubricated compressors are commonly<br />
used, it is important to have an efficient oil separation after compression. This oil<br />
separation is important not only for the oil residues from the compressor but also<br />
for removing oil naturally occurring in the biogas. The oil will otherwise foul the<br />
membrane and decrease its lifetime.<br />
The membrane separation stage is designed differently depending on the manufacturer<br />
<strong>of</strong> the system and the membranes they are using. Three <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
common designs on the market today are shown in Figure 15.<br />
Figure 15 Three different designs <strong>of</strong> the membrane stage, that are available on the<br />
market today.<br />
The first design (i) includes no internal circulation <strong>of</strong> the biogas and therefore lower<br />
energy consumption for the compression. However, the methane loss will be higher<br />
and it is important to use membranes with high selectivity, i.e. large difference<br />
between the permeation rate <strong>of</strong> methane and carbon dioxide, to minimize the me-<br />
30 Svenskt Gastekniskt Center AB, Malmö <strong>–</strong> www.sgc.se