04.10.2013 Views

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />

117<br />

Fig. 76. Audiospectrograms <strong>of</strong> calls <strong>of</strong> Sphenophryne cornuta recorded in Western Province, Papua<br />

New Guinea. A. Possible territorial calls recorded at Finalbin, July 27, 1987 (see text); 300-Hz filter,<br />

time scale <strong>of</strong> wave forms 6 that <strong>of</strong> spectrogram, air 20.3C, voucher specimen AMNH A130549,<br />

AMNH Herpetology tape reel no. 252. B. One complete advertisement call recorded by Ian Redmond<br />

at the junction <strong>of</strong> the Strickland and Rentoul rivers, Nov. 14, 1979; 300-Hz filter, no temperature, voucher<br />

specimen BMNH 1980.673, British Library <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Sounds No. 12274.<br />

S. robusta, possibly a derived condition, I see<br />

no objective way <strong>of</strong> arranging the calls on a<br />

primitive to derived axis.’’ With the New<br />

Guinean species added to the sample, one<br />

could bolster the argument for increasing<br />

complexity as a derived condition. Thus, single-note,<br />

unpulsed calls could be considered<br />

primitive compared to multinote unpulsed<br />

calls, and pulsed multinote calls would be the<br />

most derived.<br />

Although the arrangement <strong>of</strong> calls I present<br />

above is useful for descriptive purposes,<br />

it would be naive to apply it uncritically in<br />

assessing relationships. Slightly more than<br />

half <strong>of</strong> the species (10 <strong>of</strong> 18) have unpulsed<br />

calls, and these (excepting two single-note<br />

species) differ mainly in note repetition rate<br />

and dominant frequency, with the latter being<br />

probably largely a reflection <strong>of</strong> body size.<br />

Given extant knowledge, I see no way <strong>of</strong> refuting<br />

the argument that unpulsed calls are<br />

essentially primitive and, in that respect, not<br />

phylogenetically informative. With more information<br />

available it might be possible to<br />

establish a primitive-derived sequence within<br />

the unpulsed calls in the third category. The<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> species pairs makes me<br />

doubtful, however. One <strong>of</strong> the two singlenote<br />

species, L. rhododactyla, is morphologically<br />

identical to a multinote species, L. similis.<br />

How <strong>of</strong>ten might the change from single<br />

to multinotes (or the reverse) have evolved<br />

independently in different evolutionary<br />

lines?<br />

The pulsed calls <strong>of</strong> the morphologically<br />

similar species L. dentata (category 2) and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!